arXiv:2606. 26744v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present HyperDFlash, a block-parallel speculative decoding framework tailored to DeepSeek-V4's Hyper-Connections (HC).
By Luxi Lin, Shuang Peng, Rui Ma, Junhao Hua, Shuwei Fan, Zhengda Qin, Qiang Wang, Hongjian Sun, Fangmin Chen, Songwei Liu
arXiv:2609.24197v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Speculative decoding losslessly accelerates large language model inference by having a lightweight draft model predict future tokens for verification b...
By Weifan Jiang, Krishna Teja Chitty-Venkata, Megan Flynn, Reed Meyerson, Zhenting Qi, Tianyu Wu, Eldar Kurtic, Minlan Yu, Alexandre Marques
The paper introduces AdaptiveSpec, a training‑free speculative decoding method that simultaneously adapts the per‑step verification rule and the draft‑tree shape using signals generated during decoding. It replaces the fixed token‑match rule with a margin‑based threshold and adjusts tree depth, width, and node count based on draft confidence and recent acceptance history, allowing the total draft count to vary. Experiments on SGLang show up to 56% throughput gains over EAGLE‑3 while maintaining 93% of lossless task accuracy on GSM8K, MATH‑500, and HumanEval across three models.
By Oszk\'ar Urb\'an, Young D. Kwon, Stylianos I. Venieris, Cecilia Mascolo
arXiv:2609.24698v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Repeated execution of the target model during autoregressive decoding is a major source of LLM inference latency. Unlike linear speculation, which foll...
By Changxu Liu, Zhaogeng Li
arXiv:2607. 05147v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates Large Language Model (LLM) inference by decoupling draft generation from target verification.
By Xin Cheng, Xingkai Yu, Chenze Shao, Jiashi Li, Yunfan Xiong, Yi Qian, Jiaqi Zhu, Shirong Ma, Xiaokang Zhang, Jiasheng Ye, Qinyu Chen, Chengqi Deng, Jiping Yu, Damai Dai, Zhengyan Zhang, Yixuan Wei, Yixuan Tan, Wenkai Yang, Runxin Xu, Yu Wu, Zhean Xu, Xuanyu Wang, Muyang Chen, Rui Tian, Xiao Bi, Zhewen Hao, Shaoyuan Chen, Huanqi Cao, Wentao Zhang, Anyi Xu, Huishuai Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, Wenfeng Liang
arXiv:2607. 24434v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models are attractive for end-device deployment because only a small subset of experts is active per token, but their routed expert weights often exceed accelerator memory.
By Dengke Han
arXiv:2609.36590v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Self-speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by drafting tokens from the target model itself, but faces a sharp tradeof...
By Hankun Lin, Patrick Pynadath, Ruqi Zhang
arXiv:2610.00623v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Speculative decoding has achieved substantial lossless speedups for LLMs, but remains less effective for large vision-language models (LVLMs), where li...
By Wenhan Yang, Anirudh Rao, Ashwin Chandra
arXiv:2608. 12385v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models serve more requests, cumulative inference cost is becoming increasingly important relative to one-time training cost.
By Liming Liu, Mingze Wang, Tuo Zhao
arXiv:2601. 00417v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transformer residual streams evolve through additive updates.
By Yifan Zhang, Yifeng Liu, Mengdi Wang, Quanquan Gu
arXiv:2602. 20217v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-speculative decoding (SSD) accelerates LLM inference by skipping layers to create an efficient draft model, yet existing methods often rely on static heuristics that ignore the dynamic computational overhead of attention in long-context scenarios.
By Seongjin Cha, Gyuwan Kim, Dongsu Han, Tao Yang, Insu Han
WaveFront Decoding (WFD) is a training‑free, self‑speculative decoding framework for looped language models that reduces decoding latency by batching draft and verification steps within the same recurrent‑block calls. By exploiting intermediate recurrence outputs as draft predictions and weight sharing to process token states at different depths together, WFD arranges mixed‑depth states into a diagonal wavefront, allowing shallow‑depth drafting while deeper‑depth verification proceeds concurrently. Experiments on six Spec‑Bench task categories show WFD achieving up to 4.81× speedup on Huginn‑3.5B compared to autoregressive decoding, outperforming traditional draft‑then‑verify approaches.
By Hyeongju Ha, Jae-Joon Kim