arXiv:2607. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lattice quantum chromodynamics (LQCD) provides a first-principles framework for computing hadronic observables, but its practical use remains limited by the substantial expertise required to turn research motivation into reliable computing workflows.
arXiv:2604. 04089v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models can write scientific code, but direct paper-to-program translation remains fragile when correctness depends on tacit conventions in the literature.
arXiv:2508. 20134v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Programming quantum circuits at the OpenQASM level is essential for achieving hardware-aware optimization and reliable execution on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices, yet it remains challenging due to the need for domain-specific planning, iterative code synthesis, and low-level calibration.
arXiv:2608. 12249v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modernizing legacy Fortran is a problem of volume: the transformations are individually routine, but the codebases can be enormous, and across much of computational science the work simply goes undone.
arXiv:2607. 25865v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum error correction (QEC) is indispensable for scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Cross-Backend QIEO is a runtime core for quantum-inspired evolutionary optimization that unifies execution across OpenMP5, CUDA, HIP, and multiple high-level languages. It compiles a single C++ implementation per hardware target and dispatches to CPU, multi-core, NVIDIA, or AMD backends at runtime, adapting kernels to each device’s memory hierarchy. The framework is validated with real-world bindings: a Python neural‑network hyperparameter optimizer achieving 88.60 % MNIST accuracy, a MATLAB wind‑farm layout optimizer matching particle swarm results and outperforming genetic algorithms, and a Julia package that reduces mean SSE by 2.1× in Lotka–Volterra parameter estimation.
arXiv:2604. 04089v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models can write scientific code, but direct paper-to-program translation remains fragile when correctness depends on tacit conventions rather than explicit equations.
arXiv:2607. 25834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum computers are moving from research laboratories to industrial machines accessible via the cloud and integrated into high-performance computing facilities.
arXiv:2605. 30358v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantum computing remains in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, with performance constrained by noise.
arXiv:2605. 25572v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The growing complexity of quantum programming frameworks has exposed a critical limitation in existing large language model (LLM)-based code assistants: general-purpose models hallucinate PennyLane-specific gate names, misplace device configurations, and produce structurally invalid circuits when faced with specialized quantum coding challenges.
As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks. Quantum resource estimation (QRE) plays a central role in this transition, yet existing approaches remain largely compilation-heavy or domain-knowledge-guided symbolic annotations, and tightly coupled to long-term fault-tolerant assumptions, limiting their topical applicability.
The paper introduces Quantum‑Harbor, a virtual laboratory that lets AI agents interact with quantum systems in a controlled setting, enabling verification of their actions and conclusions. Using this platform, the authors created QIQCBench, a benchmark of 49 expert‑authored tasks covering calibration, control, error correction, compilation, sensing, and networking. Testing 17 state‑of‑the‑art agentic systems on QIQCBench revealed wide variation in verified performance, highlighting a gap between demonstrated capability and reliable operation and positioning Quantum‑Harbor as a foundation for measuring progress toward verified autonomy in quantum engineering.
arXiv:2608. 12936v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As quantum computing progresses from proof-of-principle demonstrations toward practical utility, a significant impediment is the need to augment algorithmic feasibility with system-level optimization across heterogeneous hardware and software stacks.