The paper evaluates a learned request‑routing policy for disaggregated large‑language‑model serving, where compute‑heavy prefill and memory‑heavy decode stages run on separate GPU pools. Using a discrete‑event simulator and real NVIDIA A40 GPUs, the calibrated router—leveraging prompt length, predicted output length, KV‑cache pressure, and SLO class—outperforms round‑robin, least‑loaded, and length‑based heuristics, achieving the highest mean goodput (0.864) and lowest variance across three mixed, bursty arrival traces. Hardware calibration proves critical, providing a 4.5‑point goodput boost and roughly 40 % of the tail‑latency advantage, and the learned router can match round‑robin performance with one fewer GPU in certain scenarios.
By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv:2608. 12123v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-agent services repeatedly execute small deterministic transitions between model and tool calls: route an outcome, update state, and emit the next effect.
By Josef Liyanjun Chen
arXiv:2605. 21312v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modern LLM serving is no longer homogeneous or monolithic.
By Yicheng Feng, Xin Tan, Yangtao Deng, Yimin Jiang, Yibo Zhu, Hong Xu
arXiv:2607. 05876v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM serving optimization typically benchmarks many configurations and reaches for heavy profilers when latency targets are missed.
By Yihua Liu
arXiv:2508. 03611v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents Astrolabe, a randomized prediction-guided scheduler for one-shot request dispatch in multi-instance large language model (LLM) serving.
By Wei Da, Evangelia Kalyvianaki
arXiv:2606. 11440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing multi-agent LLM orchestration methods, ranging from brute-force ensembles to learned routers, select models and topologies based on task and model features.
By Ahasan Kabir, Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Qian Lou
Crossflow introduces an elastic boundary for prefilling and decoding in large language model serving, allowing decode nodes to publish short‑lived leases that limit prefilling resources and output projections. By adapting to dynamic phase demand, Crossflow improves token throughput by 16.2‑17.4% on average and up to 43.4% under high load, while consistently reducing mean time‑to‑first‑token. The approach eliminates the inefficiencies of static partitioning, which can leave 17% of cluster capacity idle or cause queueing and lost throughput.
By Yi Xu, Ehsan K. Ardestani, Wenyin Fu, Martin Schatz, Krishna Malladi, Zhan Shu, Adnan Aziz, Shobhit Kanaujia, Ajit Mathews, Chunqiang Tang
arXiv:2607. 02043v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Disaggregated LLM serving runs prefill and decode on separate GPU pools to keep the two phases from interfering.
By Shrikara Arun, Anjaly Parayil, Srikant Bharadwaj, Renee St. Amant, Victor R\"uhle
arXiv:2605. 20982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AlltoAll dispatch is the dominant bottleneck of MoE expert parallelism, and the interconnect community has responded with four families of mitigations: predictive sample placement, adaptive expert relayout, hierarchical collectives, and EP-aware topology.
By Bole Ma, Jan Eitzinger, Harald Koestler, Gerhard Wellein
arXiv:2606. 00946v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Efficiently serving large language model (LLM) inference tasks is crucial both for user-perceived latency such as time-to-first-token (TTFT) and for GPU utilization.
By Gangmuk Lim, Wanyu Zhao, Brighten Godfrey, Jiaxin Shan, Le Xu, Liguang Xie
arXiv:2606. 28565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) move into production serving, practitioners must rapidly evaluate inference performance across diverse hardware, models, and serving parameters to meet cost and latency targets.
By Xiteng Yao, Taeho Kim, Hengzhi Pei, Xinle Liu, Kyle Ulrich, Leonard Lausen, Ashish Khetan, Xiang Song, George Karypis, Martin Herbordt
arXiv:2607. 17181v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Serverless multi-model LLM systems multiplex popularity-skewed model catalogs over shared GPU pools, yet typically schedule each request independently.
By Utopia Meng, Unicornt Zhao, Derek Li, Goalen Gao, Frank Du