arXiv:2607. 06479v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising framework for solving partial differential equations while embedding the underlying physical laws directly into the learning process.
By Sonal Ankush Chibire, Jenn-Terng Gau, Bo Zhang
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising framework for solving partial differential equations while embedding the underlying physical laws directly into the learning process. This study presents a PINN-based framework for modeling transient elastodynamic wave propagation in bimaterial systems governed by the axisymmetric equations of linear elasticity.
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
Physics-Informed Error Field Learning (PIEFL) is a post‑training optimization framework for Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). After a primary network reaches satisfactory accuracy, PIEFL introduces an auxiliary error network that learns the discrepancy between the current approximation and the exact solution by deriving error control equations under physical constraints. The learned error correction is then combined with the primary prediction, improving solution accuracy without modifying the primary network architecture and focusing computational resources on correcting existing prediction errors.
By Jiuyun Sun, Yong Zhang
arXiv:2609.07983v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), offering a me...
By Davide Staub, Ben Moseley
arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partia...
By Muhammad Luthfi Shahab, Imam Mukhlash, Hadi Susanto
The paper presents Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs) and their multilevel extensions as a new approach to solving the Helmholtz equation. By decomposing the computational domain into overlapping sub‑domains, each governed by a local neural network, the method aims to improve accuracy and computational efficiency for high‑frequency wave problems in complex two‑dimensional domains. The authors evaluate the technique on the homogeneous Helmholtz case, showing its potential to overcome limitations of traditional finite difference and finite element methods.
By Victorita Dolean, Daria Hrebenshchykova, St\'ephane Lanteri, Victor Michel-Dansac
arXiv:2601. 20361v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) solve time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) by learning a mesh-free, differentiable solution that can be evaluated anywhere in space and time.
By Chen-Yang Dai, Che-Chia Chang, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai, Chieh-Hsin Lai
arXiv:2606. 28220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful tool for solving nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs), including battery electrochemical models.
By Gift Modekwe, Qiugang Lu
arXiv:2606. 02623v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Solving time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) is an important problem in computational science and engineering.
By Abhishek Chandra, Taniya Kapoor
arXiv:2502. 00803v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have earned high expectations in solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but their optimization usually faces thorny challenges due to the unique derivative-dependent loss function.
By Yuezhou Ma, Haixu Wu, Hang Zhou, Huikun Weng, Jianmin Wang, Mingsheng Long
The paper introduces NEXT, a new physics-informed neural architecture that combines Neuro‑Spectral Architectures with high‑order exponential time‑differencing integrators. NEXT integrates the stiff linear part of PDEs exactly via matrix exponentials while a neural network models the remaining nonlinear dynamics, thereby overcoming spectral bias, causality issues, and numerical instability seen in previous PINNs and NeuSAs. Benchmark tests on stiff PDEs show NEXT remains stable and accurate, and it can also solve inverse problems by learning unknown parameters or boundary conditions from sparse data.
By M\'arcio Marques, Leonardo Mendon\c{c}a, Leonardo M. Moreira, Christian J\'unior de Oliveira, Vitor Balestro, Tiago Novello, Daniel Yukimura, Pavel Petrov, Lucas Nissenbaum