arXiv AI

ReForge: Keeping ABR Algorithms Never Finished with Verified Large Language Model Edits

arXiv:2608. 15138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Designing an ABR algorithm for one network scenario takes an engineer months, and large language models now do this work in hours, matching or beating hand-built designs.

arXiv AI
4d ago

StateTape: Action-Conditioned Evidence Lifecycle Modeling for Long-Horizon Coding Agents

StateTape introduces a new framework for long‑horizon coding agents that rewrites the agent’s context as the code repository changes, rather than letting the context grow with every observation. It models the repository as a symbol‑level code graph, using a tape to mark symbols altered by each write and a manager model to resolve stale records. The authors provide theoretical analysis, a new benchmark called TraceBench, and empirical results showing higher resolve rates across six agents and three edit‑heavy benchmarks with minimal computational overhead.

By Ziyang Yu, Liang Zhao, Bowen Zhu, Hasibul Haque
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Belief-Calibrated Optimization: An Explicit World Model for Agentic Optimization

The paper introduces Belief-Calibrated Optimization (BCO), a method that records and updates a persistent in‑context document representing an agent’s belief about how the environment responds to edits. By continually revising this world model as new candidates are evaluated, BCO improves the performance of frozen LLM agents across five benchmarks, outperforming a control lacking the world model. An offline ablation shows that the document’s content provides reusable, accurate predictions of environmental responses, beyond mere form.

By Yuhan Chen, Zhihua Tian, Mahavir Dabas, Charith Peris, Rahul Gupta, Ming Jin, Feiyang Kang, Siyuan Zhang, Nan Wang, Ruoxi Jia
arXiv AI
4d ago

Neuro-Symbolic Computer Use: Learning Reusable Policies for Reliable and Efficient Execution

The paper introduces neuro‑symbolic computer use, a method that learns reusable policies to execute recurring computer workflows efficiently. Instead of re‑planning each run, the learned policy encodes stable decisions (ordering, variables, loops, branches) into executable code while delegating observation‑dependent decisions to neural models. Using neuro‑symbolic policy iteration, the approach iteratively refines the policy from a single agent trajectory, diagnoses failures, and revises the code with a coding model, achieving superior Pass^3 scores and significant reductions in per‑run cost and latency on OSWorld‑Verified and ScienceBoard benchmarks.

By Hyewon Suh, Thanh Minh Nguyen, Chih-Lun Lee, Darrow Hartman, Lizhao Liu, Xin Eric Wang, Ang Li, Jiachen Yang
arXiv AI
Sep 24

Agent-Editing World Model: Rethinking World Modeling for LLM Agents

The paper introduces the Agent-Editing World Model (AEWM), a new approach that models how reasoning and actions influence future task progress instead of simulating tool responses. AEWM includes an Action Judge that classifies decisions as Critical, Exploratory, or Noisy, and a State Revision mechanism that edits noisy reasoning–action continuations from the same observed history. The integrated system, EditAct, directly updates the underlying state during real execution, leading to significant performance gains across multiple benchmarks and agent backbones.

By Shuang Sun, Guoxin Chen, Fanzhe Meng, Jia Deng, Huatong Song, Jinhao Jiang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Hongteng Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

CORE: Conflict-Oriented Reasoning Elimination for Verifiable Language-Model Search

CORE is a search controller that uses a verifier to obtain a certified conflict core, backjumps to the latest decision in that core, and caches the conflict to prevent repetition. In experiments on 2,000 graph‑coloring instances, CORE cuts median verifier calls by up to 39.8% compared to chronological repair, and improves success rates on five reasoning tasks, achieving 75.9% with Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct and 84.2% with Qwen3‑8B versus 72.5% and 81.8% for Tree of Thoughts. The approach also reduces verifier calls and generated tokens on both language‑model backbones.

By Siyu Song, Rui Xu, Jia Lin, Kai Liu, Weifang Wang
arXiv AI
2d ago

Revision-Aware Independent Agent Graphs for Dynamic Reasoning

The paper introduces Revision‑Aware Independent Agent Graphs (RIAG) to address dynamic task routing, where an event stream continually revises task bindings and a system must select the correct document version at query time. By repurposing six benchmarks into over 31,000 dynamic episodes, the authors demonstrate that RIAG balances recomputation and reuse, achieving 54.24 % joint routing‑and‑answer accuracy with only 0.62 calls per query—substantially better than the strongest baseline. The study highlights the trade‑off between stale conclusions and wasted work in dynamic reasoning settings.

By Yan Luo, Selim-Antoine Lali, Jeremy Moebel, Iliass Khoutaibi, Ahmadou Aidara, Mengyu Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Infinite-Parameter LLMs: Generating and Adapting Weights from Live Data

The paper proposes an Infinite-Parameter LLM architecture that generates and adapts its weights from live interaction data using a compact hypernetwork and Bayesian updating, allowing the model to learn from real-time user input rather than relying solely on static pretraining. This approach keeps the stored footprint fixed while effectively enabling an infinite set of weights, potentially improving compute efficiency, freeing context windows, and providing persistent, generalizable knowledge across turns. The authors also outline an evaluation protocol to compare this method against traditional in-context learning and retrieval techniques.

By Jinli Hu, Ross M. Clarke, Yichuan Zhang, Jos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato