arXiv Machine Learning

Edge Accuracy Is Not Enough: Why Dynamics-Learned Structure Fails to Transfer to Inverse Problems

The paper investigates why transferring relational structure learned from abundant forward-simulation data fails for inverse problems, despite theoretical expectations. It demonstrates that dynamics‑learned graphs, such as those from Neural Relational Inference, can worsen performance by over 100% compared to a task‑optimised attention baseline, and that this failure persists across multiple evidence lines. The authors formalise the gap as an approximation‑error issue and propose a lightweight transferability test based on Jaccard similarity to predict successful transfer.

arXiv AI
Oct 28

Posterior-First Neural PDE Simulation: Inferring What Downstream Tasks Need from a Single Field

Posterior-First Neural PDE Simulation proposes a new paradigm where downstream tasks dictate the minimal problem state to infer, and a posterior over that state conditions future predictions. The approach replaces traditional field-to-future predictors, which collapse distinct latent states, with a task-to-target-to-interface framework that preserves necessary ambiguity. Experiments on synthetic and PDEBench tasks show that posterior recovery improves rollout accuracy, reducing error by 59.4% of the direct-to-oracle gap.

By Wenshuo Wang, Fan Zhang
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

The Equilibrium Is the Initialization: Lazy Identity Collapse in Physics-Structured Deep Equilibrium Reasoning

Deep equilibrium models promise input-adaptive implicit computation: harder problems should demand more solver iterations, and the solved equilibrium should encode the result of genuine iterative inference. We report a cautionary study of a port-Hamiltonian DEQ with a learned initialization on two reasoning tasks -- ProofWriter entailment over frozen DeBERTa embeddings and a BFS-verified graph-reachability benchmark -- in which the implicit computation is a silent no-op.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Disentangling Attention in Deep Operator Learning: A Controlled Study of Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Architectures

The paper investigates how different attention mechanisms affect the performance of DeepONet neural operators. Five variants—varying in cross‑attention, self‑attention, tokenization, and attention depth—are trained in both data‑driven and physics‑informed settings on one‑ and two‑dimensional PDE benchmarks. Results show that per‑sensor tokenization with cross‑attention consistently reduces error, while branch self‑attention helps only in complex spatial problems, and deeper cross‑attention yields diminishing returns with higher cost.

By Amar Alem Koric, Qibang Liu, Seid Koric