arXiv Machine Learning

One Algorithm, Two Goals: Dual Scoring for Parameter and Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning

The paper introduces DualSFT, a one-shot algorithm that simultaneously selects a parameter mask and a data subset for fine‑tuning large language models by using a shared gradient‑interaction matrix. By casting both selections as bilevel problems under a common validation objective, the authors derive a unified scoring rule that aggregates parameter importance and data utility as column‑wise and row‑wise sums of the same matrix. Experiments on 3B‑9B LLMs show that DualSFT improves target‑task performance and stability‑plasticity trade‑offs compared to single‑axis variants and outperforms sequential hybrid baselines under matched budgets.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

Data-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization for Target Model Data Selection in LLM Post-Training

Data-DPO is a target model‑oriented supervised fine‑tuning data selection method that uses one‑step probing of the target model to generate pairwise data preferences, trains a lightweight reward model to capture these preferences, and then selects a training subset by combining target‑model preference, external quality scores, and marginal diversity. Experiments on Vision‑Flan and LLaVA‑CoT demonstrate that Data‑DPO consistently outperforms existing data selection baselines across multiple data budgets and even surpasses full data training performance.

By Peng Sun, Yi Yang, Antong Zhang, Chunxiao Li, Yanbo Wang, Dianbo Liu, xin chen, Kai Yu, Lu Chen, Tianfan Fu
arXiv AI
3d ago

An Embarrassingly Simple Data Selection Strategy for Million-Scale Multi-Modal Instruction-Tuning

The paper introduces SSR, a simple yet effective data selection strategy for million‑scale multi‑modal instruction‑tuning. SSR uses interaction styles as a proxy for structural diversity and decomposes data quality into capability‑specific scores, forming a rich profile for each sample. By casting selection as submodular coverage maximization, SSR consistently outperforms random sampling across two architecture stacks, multiple data pools, and 14 benchmarks, achieving 99.1% of full‑data performance with only 30% of a 2.6M pool.

By Mengyao Lyu, Yan Li, Huasong Zhong, Hui Chen, Jungong Han, Guiguang Ding, Zhenheng Yang
arXiv AI
Oct 2

Scalable, Transferable Meta-network for Data Selection Requires a Different Loss (and Why the Obvious Choice is Problematic)

The paper introduces TESS, a scalable data‑selection framework that replaces per‑sample weights with a selection network to improve transferability across datasets and model sizes. It identifies instability in existing meta‑learning for training‑data selection (MTS) due to weight suppression and overreliance on easy features, and proposes a Pointwise Value Matching objective to address these issues. Experiments on large language model safety and instruction tuning show strong transfer from subsets to full corpora and from smaller to larger models.

By Zilin Du, Bowen Yang, Boyang Albert Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

GroupDPO: Memory-Efficient Group-Wise Direct Preference Optimization

GroupDPO introduces a memory‑efficient approach to group‑wise direct preference optimization for aligning large language models. By using first‑order linearization with per‑response coefficients, the method decouples samples during backpropagation, dramatically reducing peak memory usage and enabling scalable training with larger groups. Experiments in both offline and online settings show that leveraging multiple responses consistently outperforms single‑pair training, and adding a negative log‑likelihood term on positive responses is essential for performance gains and training stability.

By Jixuan Leng, Si Si, Hsiang-Fu Yu, Vinod Raman, Inderjit S. Dhillon
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Where to Adapt Matters: Layer-Selective Fine-Tuning for Capability Retention

The paper investigates how the choice of Transformer layers for fine‑tuning affects both task performance and the preservation of pre‑trained capabilities. By measuring layer sensitivity with a forward‑only input–output cosine similarity metric, the authors identify layers that are more suitable for adaptation. They introduce Layer‑Selective LoRA (LS‑LoRA), which trains adapters only in low‑similarity layers, and demonstrate that this approach improves target‑task results while better retaining commonsense reasoning compared to standard all‑layer LoRA.

By Zhiqiang Pang, Zihong Sun, Qi Xie, Jun Shu, Deyu Meng, Zongben Xu