arXiv:2606. 04468v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline multi-objective optimization (Offline MOO) aims to discover novel Pareto-optimal designs based on static datasets without expensive environment interactions.
By Ruiqing Sun, Sen Yang, Dawei Feng, Bo Ding, Yijie Wang, Huaimin Wang
arXiv:2609.38920v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Offline multi-objective optimization (MOO) seeks solutions with better objective trade-offs using only a fixed dataset, without querying the objectives...
By Yuan Lu, Esha Singh, Yi-An Ma, Yusu Wang
arXiv:2601. 22495v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Fine-tuning flow matching models is a central challenge in settings with limited data, evolving distributions, or computational constraints.
By Gudrun Thorkelsdottir, Arindam Banerjee
Offline multi-objective optimization (MOO) seeks solutions with better objective trade-offs using only a fixed dataset, without querying the objectives. Diffusion models trained on such data have emer...
Fenchel Tilt Flow Control (FTFC) is a new method for fine‑tuning pretrained generative models to arbitrary preference functions. It decouples utility optimization from model fitting by first learning reward and density‑ratio weights on pretrained samples, then freezing these weights to adjust a diffusion or flow model in a single importance‑weighted stage. The approach supports general f‑divergence penalties, achieves exact duality for concave utilities, and demonstrates up to 20× efficiency gains while outperforming baselines on image and molecule generation tasks.
By Maksim Bobrin, Maksim Zhdanov, Dmitry Dylov
arXiv:2607. 14652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Topology optimisation (TO) often requires repeated finite element analysis and sensitivity-based material updates, which can be costly when multiple candidate designs are needed under varying physical and design conditions.
By Shusheng Xiao, Jinshuai Bai, Hyogu Jeong, Yunfei Xi, Yilin Gui, YuanTong Gu
arXiv:2605. 12951v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose Coreset-Induced Conditional Velocity Flow Matching (CCVFM), a generative model that augments hierarchical rectified flow with a data-informed source distribution.
By Xiao Wang, Zihua She, Jianxi Su
Generative models have undergone many generations of evolution, from VAEs/GANs to diffusion/flow matching. Along the way, the underlying techniques have become more complicated and various beliefs about what drives strong empirical performance have taken hold.
arXiv:2606. 30574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many modern generative modeling methods, including diffusion models, normalizing flows, and flow matching, estimate transport maps or plans between distributions without explicitly targeting an optimal transport (OT) map.
By Sivaraman Balakrishnan
Many modern generative modeling methods, including diffusion models, normalizing flows, and flow matching, estimate transport maps or plans between distributions without explicitly targeting an optimal transport (OT) map. In applications like generative modeling, the transport cost itself is irrelevant, and this makes it natural to target maps which are more tractable from either a statistical or computational standpoint.
The paper introduces Wasserstein‑Tilted Flow Maps (WTF), a simulation‑free reinforcement learning method that fine‑tunes pre‑trained flow‑based generative models by adding an optimal transport regularizer derived from the model’s drift. Unlike traditional KL‑reward tilting, WTF transports individual samples toward higher reward, framing the problem as a deterministic optimal control task on the flow map. Experiments on ImageNet‑256 and text‑to‑image demonstrate that WTF achieves higher reward and comparable or better diversity while reducing training compute by up to 280×.
By Abbas Mammadov, Jerry Y. Huang, Justin Lin, Partha Kaushik, Sheel Shah, Kartik Nair, Yee Whye Teh, Nicholas M. Boffi
arXiv:2608. 00978v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Flow Matching trains continuous-time generative models by regressing the velocity field of a probability path between a simple source distribution and a target data distribution.
By Jin-Young Kim, So-Yoon Cho, Hyun-Gyoon Kim