arXiv:2609.15885v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: This study proposes a privacy-enhanced federated learning framework to address secure collaborative training in distributed data environments. The fr...
By Zhen Zhong (Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA), Shini Yang (LinkedIn, CA, USA), Liesheng Wei (Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China)
The paper introduces a general learning framework that protects privacy in federated learning by distorting model parameters, enabling a trade‑off between privacy and utility. The algorithm supports arbitrary privacy measurements and delivers personalized utility‑privacy balances for each parameter, client, and communication round. The authors prove that the gap between their algorithm’s utility loss and the optimal loss is sub‑linear in iterations, provide a convergence rate, and demonstrate empirically that their method outperforms baselines under the same privacy budget.
By Xiaojin Zhang, Wenjie Li, Yiming Li, Wei Chen, Shutao Xia, Qiang Yang
arXiv:2606. 26037v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning has emerged as the foremost approach for decentralized model training with privacy preservation.
By Guangzheng Hu, Patricia Men\'endez, Feng Liu, Mingming Gong, Guanghui Wang, Liuhua Peng
arXiv:2608. 02250v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a popular distributed learning framework where multiple clients perform local training and a server aggregates the locally updated models.
By Yuan-Heng Tsai, Li-Hsing Yen, Yan-Wei Chen
arXiv:2510. 04902v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Tuning hyperparameters in federated machine learning can substantially impact model performance.
By Johannes Liebenow, Thorsten Peinemann, Esfandiar Mohammadi
The paper introduces a federated inference framework that enables multiple commercial large language model (LLM) APIs—such as LLaMA‑3.3‑70B, GPT‑4o‑mini, and Claude‑3‑Haiku—to collaborate on cognitive diagnosis tasks without accessing raw student data or proprietary model internals. Each entity’s predictions are perturbed with Laplace noise to provide epsilon‑local differential privacy, and a residual‑based aggregation scheme mitigates model heterogeneity. Experiments on three educational benchmarks demonstrate strong privacy guarantees with minimal accuracy loss, confirming the framework’s practical usability and cross‑domain generalizability.
By Yagna Manasa Boyapati, Chong Yu, Tianyu Jiang, Justin Zhan
arXiv:2411.16478v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Measuring distribution drifts is a key task in managing distributed, sensitive data, as it underpins a wide range of federated learning and analyti...
By Sayan Biswas, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple, Mary Scott
arXiv:2606. 31742v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explainable AI (XAI) methods have demonstrated significant success in recent years at identifying relevant features in input data that drive deep learning model decisions, enhancing interpretability for users.
By Maximilian Andreas Hoefler, Karsten Mueller, Wojciech Samek
Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity. In practice, many HDP-FL systems employ $\varepsilon$-aware server aggregation to improve model utility by re-weighting client updates according to their declared privacy budgets.
arXiv:2606. 16891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning is rapidly evolving beyond the exchange of traditional model weights and gradients, yet existing definitions fail to capture the full scope of modern payloads like synthetic data and federated analytics.
By Alvaro Javier Vargas Guerrero, Xinguang Wang, Quang Manh Doan, Guy Nagels
The paper introduces a Differentially Private Federated Proximal (DP‑FedProx) framework for predicting customer churn in telecom networks. It compares DP‑FedProx with FedAvg, DP‑FedAvg, FedProx, and several centralized/local models on two public churn datasets, showing that DP‑FedProx consistently outperforms FedAvg variants and matches the best centralized model with only a slight accuracy loss while offering privacy guarantees. SHAP analysis reveals that DP‑FedProx prioritizes revenue‑group features, highlighting its practical balance between performance and privacy.
By Joydeb Kumar Sana, Subrata Chakraborty, M M Manjurul Islam
arXiv:2502. 17748v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) inherently mitigates mass data centralization risks; however, its privacy protections are not equally distributed - leaving vulnerable individuals disproportionately exposed to sophisticated privacy attacks.
By Tianyu Zhao, Mahmoud Srewa, Salma Elmalaki