arXiv:2610.19439v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While LLM-based agent systems have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in reasoning and solving complex real-world tasks, they also come with substanti...
By Yuanpu Cao, Saket Sathe, Hanyu Wang, Ziyi Yin, Fenglong Ma, Jinghui Chen
arXiv:2607. 19450v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale online reinforcement learning (RL) is the predominant means of eliciting advanced abilities including long-term reasoning and agentic tool use in large language models (LLMs).
By Yunjie Chen, Xiaoxin Chen, Fang Wang
arXiv:2606. 27814v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training small language-model agents for long-horizon interactive tasks requires both fast imitation and reward-driven improvement.
By Qitai Tan, Zefang Zong, Mo Li, Yipeng Shi, Yang Li, Peng Chen
arXiv:2605. 07804v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) leverages dense teacher rewards to enhance reasoning models.
By Zhicheng Yang, Zhijiang Guo, Yifan Song, Minrui Xu, Yongxin Wang, Yiwei Wang, Xiaodan Liang, Jing Tang
arXiv:2607. 24280v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic search enables large language models to solve knowledge-intensive tasks by interleaving multi-step reasoning with retrieval, yet optimizing this with outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) provides only sparse supervision.
By Junlin Liu, Jiangwang Chen, Zixin Song, Shuaiyu Zhou, Chunji Lv, Hank Wu, Kailin Jiang, Jinyang Wu, Bohan Yu, Chenxi Zhou
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training. As models scale, post-training itself becomes a bottleneck.
Large-scale online reinforcement learning (RL) is the predominant means of eliciting advanced abilities including long-term reasoning and agentic tool use in large language models (LLMs). However, continuing to scale it across vast task domains of interest remains challenging in both computational infrastructure and cost, especially when considering RL as merely a one-off learning stage.
SOD: Step-wise On-policy Distillation for Small Language Model Agents proposes a new framework that adaptively reweights distillation strength at each reasoning step based on step-level divergence. This approach mitigates cascading errors in tool-integrated reasoning by attenuating misleading teacher signals in high-divergence regions while preserving dense guidance where student and teacher align. Experiments on math, science, and code benchmarks show up to 20.86% improvement over the second-best baseline, with a 0.6B student scoring 26.13% on AIME 2025.
By Qiyong Zhong, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Xin Lin, Jie Sun, Houcheng Jiang, Xiang Wang, Junfeng Fang
OPDSearch+ introduces a two‑stage distillation framework for search‑augmented reasoning that eliminates the need for task‑specific teacher fine‑tuning. In the first stage, a frozen off‑the‑shelf instruct model guides a student through live search interactions using a per‑position forward KL objective, transferring reasoning decomposition and evidence integration skills. The second stage refines this student with reinforcement learning, achieving performance surpassing RL alone and outperforming all prior 3B‑parameter baselines on seven QA benchmarks, including 13.1% improvement on HotpotQA and 8.5% on 2WikiMultihopQA.
By Qinglin Ye, Zhiyuan Gu, Jingjie Xia, Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shunchao Zheng, Yuhang Mu, Wenchao Du, Yiming Wang
arXiv:2606. 27814v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training small language-model agents for long-horizon interactive tasks requires both fast imitation and reward-driven improvement.
By Qitai Tan, Zefang Zong, Yang Li, Peng Chen
arXiv:2509. 14257v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Model agents achieve strong performance on multi-step reasoning and tool-use tasks, but their impressive capabilities typically rely on extremely large backbones.
By Yuanjie Lyu, Chengyu Wang, Jun Huang, Tong Xu
ReCal introduces a Recovery‑Aware Calibration method that adjusts calibration statistics before structured pruning to preserve teacher‑supported predictions. By using forward KL divergence between an unpruned teacher and a pruned probe, ReCal reweights pruning criteria to reduce damage that persists after offline distillation. Experiments show that ReCal consistently improves mathematical reasoning performance after on‑policy distillation, achieving up to 16.7 percentage‑point gains on AIME and better code‑generation results across multiple models and pruning methods.
By Houcheng Jiang, Mao Zheng, Mingyang Song, Qiyong Zhong, Jie Sun, Tianyu Zhang, Junfeng Fang