arXiv:2609.22101v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language models can process increasingly long prompts, yet their ability to locate and use decisive evidence may degrade as irrelevant or confu...
By Meysam Ghaffari, Nina Fatehi, Bhaskar Sen, Nasim Sabetpour, Carlos Morato
arXiv:2605. 10828v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As large language models are increasingly deployed in retrieval-augmented generation and agentic systems that accumulate extensive context, understanding how distracting information affects long-context performance becomes critical.
By Muhan Gao, Zih-Ching Chen, Kuan-Hao Huang
arXiv:2609.30738v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: KV cache eviction methods such as SnapKV and PyramidKV rank tokens solely by mean attention over a small observation window. We study a unified score,...
By Tianfang Xie, Wei Zhu
The paper introduces Stratified Sparse Attention (SSA), a framework that blends deterministic top‑k retrieval with score‑guided sampling to reduce the gap between sparse and dense attention in large language models. SSA attends to high‑scoring tokens deterministically while sampling the remaining attention mass using proxy scores, thereby recovering more of the attention distribution. Experiments on benchmarks such as RULER, LongBench, LOFT, and AIME show that SSA outperforms existing sparse methods across models ranging from 3B to 27B parameters, achieving significant accuracy gains and up to 2.96× decode speedup with optimized CUDA kernels.
By Sahil Joshi, Prithvi Dixit, Aryan Katiyar, Agniva Chowdhury, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Anshumali Shrivastava, Aditya Desai, Kumar Krishna Agrawal
arXiv:2607. 27692v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Top-$K$ sparse attention reduces the cost of Softmax and value aggregation by attending to only a small subset of key--value (KV) entries.
By Wenshuai Yao, Wenyong Zhou, Hanyong Shao, Yizhe Chen, Zhiyuan Ning, Yuannuo Feng, Ru Huang, Kechao Tang
arXiv:2602.06317v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Attention-mass concentration creates an opportunity for sparse decoding, but retained mass alone does not guarantee a stable greedy decision: retri...
By Jorge L. Ruiz Williams
arXiv:2609.37879v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: How many tokens from its context does a language model actually use, and what determines that number? We study this question through self-attention....
By Timur Mudarisov, Mikhail Burtsev, Radu State
arXiv:2607. 09889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fixed-state sequence models compress an unbounded past into a bounded state, which caps their associative recall at roughly the state dimension; attention escapes the cap by keeping a key-value entry for every token, at quadratic compute and a cache that grows with the sequence.
By Siddharth Pal, Viktoria Rojkova
The paper introduces Warrant, a method that locates and controls the contributions of attention mechanisms to model metrics. Warrant exposes the item‑wise contribution path to the reported metric and applies query‑conditioned permission on that path. Experiments on multiple datasets show that Warrant improves primary metrics in most comparisons, reveals a weak correlation between attention and prediction utility, and demonstrates that learned permission can recover evidence ranking while suppressing distractors.
By Minwoo Yu, Young-guk Ha
arXiv:2608. 03297v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A standard claim in the literature on retrieval-augmented and memory-augmented language models is that shorter context is better when the relevant information is preserved.
By Mohsen Arjmandi
arXiv:2605. 09778v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Evaluating softmax attention over a fixed long context requires reading every cached key-value pair for each new query token.
By Jo\~ao Monteiro, Michal Klein, Pierre Ablin, Marco Cuturi
arXiv:2607. 20524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mean cross-positional attention degradation is widely reported in transformer interpretability, yet whether it causally limits contextual retrieval remains untested.
By Sagar Dangal, Manoj Shakya