arXiv:2606. 05085v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The title of a research paper conveys its primary idea and, occasionally, its conclusions in a clear and concise manner.
arXiv:2508.14273v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As researchers increasingly adopt LLMs as writing assistants, generating high-quality research paper introductions remains both challenging and ess...
Highlights provide a concise summary of the main contributions of an academic paper and help readers quickly understand its focus. However, many journals do not provide highlights, which limits their use in literature retrieval, text mining, and bibliometric analysis.
arXiv:2606. 05494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
arXiv:2606. 05494v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
arXiv:2608. 25826v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A recent line of synthetic-data work reconstructs the thinking behind existing text rather than rewriting the text itself, but it operates on short web passages, recovers only local thoughts, and leaves the structure of whole documents untouched.
Scientific long-document summarization datasets commonly treat author-written abstracts as gold reference summaries, although their quality and alignment with the source article vary. At the same time, publicly available scientific summarization datasets remain limited in scale and structure for modern long-context models.
Rubric-based evaluation is a promising approach for assessing open-ended outputs from LLM-based research agents, particularly in paper reproduction, where direct paper-to-repository comparison is prone to hallucination. However, constructing paper-specific rubrics requires substantial expert effort, limiting the scalability of benchmarks such as PaperBench.
RATIO (Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations) is a large-scale benchmark designed to evaluate how well retrieval systems can support scientific inspiration. It defines relevance through three ideation moves—Address, Broaden, and Specify—each targeting different levels of abstraction in literature retrieval. The benchmark is built from millions of full-text CS papers using a novel discourse-marker distant supervision method, and includes extensive LLM and human vetting to ensure quality.
arXiv:2603. 27435v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate comprehensive, knowledge-intensive reports.
arXiv:2607. 17524v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose Token-Level Off-Policy Labeling (TOPL), an off-policy training paradigm that reframes post-training as a token-level correctness prediction task.
arXiv:2607. 25630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Interdisciplinary research is accelerating, yet scientific papers remain difficult to understand outside their home fields.
arXiv:2503.06868v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing long-text generation methods produce lengthy outputs from short inputs, leaving long-input-to-long-output generation underexplored....