arXiv Machine Learning

Provable Quantum--Classical Separation for Continuous Gibbs Sampling

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Smoothed Picard Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

arXiv:2609.06906v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We develop a new low-accuracy sampler, called \emph{smoothed Picard Hamiltonian Monte Carlo}, which combines Gaussian smoothing, Picard iteration, an...

By Fan Chen, Sinho Chewi, Jianfeng Lu, Matthew S Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Optimal Quantum-Classical Separations for Exact Learning

arXiv:2609.38073v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study exact learning with membership queries for concept classes $\mathcal C\subseteq\{0,1\}^N$, focusing on the relationships among their determi...

By Srinivasan Arunachalam, Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

How fast can you find a good hypothesis?

arXiv:2509. 03734v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In the hypothesis selection problem, we are given sample and query access to finite set of candidate distributions (hypotheses), $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1, \ldots, H_n\}$, and samples from an unknown distribution $P$, both over a domain $\mathcal{X}$.

By Anders Aamand, Maryam Aliakbarpour, Justin Y. Chen, Sandeep Silwal
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

Gaussian Approximation for Composition and Subsampling of Differentially Private Algorithms

The paper presents a Gaussian approximation for the privacy loss distribution in differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP‑SGD) when subsampling is used. It shows that, after truncating rare large losses, the privacy loss behaves like a Gaussian with the same mean and variance, up to a small shift that grows only logarithmically with the error tolerance. This leads to tighter variance‑based bounds for subsampled mechanisms, improving upon previous Renyi‑divergence analyses and explaining the effectiveness of the connect‑the‑dots method for random allocation sampling.

By Vitaly Feldman, Moshe Shenfeld