arXiv:2606. 00130v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large deep neural networks are costly to store and deploy because inference must move and evaluate many parameters.
By Andrzej Cichocki, Michal Wietczak
The paper discusses tensorizing neural networks by reshaping dense weight matrices into higher-order tensors and approximating them with low-rank tensor network decompositions. This approach offers promising model compression and introduces bond indices that create new latent spaces, potentially enhancing interpretability. Despite encouraging empirical results, tensorized neural networks remain underused, and the authors call for more research to address practical scaling and adoption challenges.
By Safa Hamreras, Sukhbinder Singh, Rom\'an Or\'us
arXiv:2608. 17135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tensor networks are powerful formats for compressing large-scale data.
By Xiao Wang, Tomohiro Hashizume, Pia Siegl, Dieter Jaksch
The paper introduces GaugeLasso, a method that applies symmetric group‑lasso penalties to transformer channels during training, enabling entire tensor slices to be zeroed out while maintaining dense tensors for GPU efficiency. By calibrating channel penalties based on inference utility per compute, the network self‑organizes into depth‑dependent structural profiles that can be dramatically smaller than the original architecture, achieving up to 255‑fold compression on a polynomial division task and outperforming hand‑designed baselines on language modeling and autoencoding benchmarks. The approach also accelerates training and reveals over‑provisioned axes that guide subsequent design iterations.
By Jed A. Duersch, Na\"im Es-Sebbani, Nathana\"el Haas, Zied Bouraoui
arXiv:2606. 25971v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern neural network training relies on optimizers such as Adam and Muon which act on each weight matrix as a single object.
By Alexander H\"agele, Alejandro Hern\'andez-Cano, Atli Kosson, Martin Jaggi
arXiv:2608. 00029v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The performance of deep learning models at scale relies heavily on how effectively high-level mathematical operations are mapped to underlying physical hardware.
By Adwaid Suresh, Aparna A, Harshini V M, Jona Delcy C A, Killi Uma Maheswara Rao, Ram Charan Golla, Surendra Vendra
arXiv:2607. 09967v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many neural networks operations have a multiplicative nature rather than additive: halving or doubling a norm are analogous relatively but require unequal optimization distances when taking linear steps.
By Ethan Smith
DanLing NestedTensor is a PyTorch tensor abstraction that embeds multi‑ragged structure directly into the tensor, allowing packed values to carry partition information and logical dimension order. This design enables broadcasting, feature transformations, and reductions to automatically respect ragged axes while preserving the same representation through autograd and both eager and compiled execution. Benchmarks on an A100 show significant speedups—up to 3.39× over padding for BERT models and 2.40–4.32× for a Pairformer‑style workload—while dramatically reducing peak memory usage.
By Zhiyuan Chen
arXiv:2411. 09816v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large neural networks achieve state-of-the-art performance on many tasks, yet their sheer size hinders deployment on resource-constrained devices.
By Cem \"Uy\"uk, Mike Lasby, Mohamed Yassin, Utku Evci, Yani Ioannou
arXiv:2511. 04981v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model depth is a double-edged sword in deep learning: deeper models achieve higher accuracy but require higher computational cost.
By Zhiqi Bu
arXiv:2607. 03148v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation functions are considered an essential primitive for neural nonlinearity, i.
By Muhammad Sabih, Frank Hannig, J\"urgen Teich
This survey reviews tensor methods applied to large language models, framing them through a seven‑stage lifecycle (tokenization, embeddings, pre‑training, adaptation, compression, inference, interpretability) and a component view (embeddings, attention, feed‑forward networks). It offers unified notation, theoretical foundations, and comparative analyses of tensorization strategies for Transformer components, while highlighting evaluation protocol differences and model scale effects. The paper also introduces a new metric, ρ_gap, to quantify the gap between theoretical memory savings and actual system‑level speedup, and connects tensor techniques to related efficiency and probabilistic methods.
By Matvei Tarasov, Salman Ahmadi-Asl, Andre L. F. de Almeida, Andrzej Cichocki