arXiv AI

What Eviction Destroys: A Restore-Counterfactual Audit of Forgetting in Agent Memory

arXiv AI
Sep 10

When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents

The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.

By Shweta Mishra, Shashank Mishra
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Can an AI Assistant Really Forget? Auditable Deletion from Addressable Memory

This paper introduces a deletion interface for a pretrained language model, measuring how effectively deleted records are removed from the model’s memory. By retrofitting a support‑vector memory gate into the global attention layers of a frozen Gemma 3, the authors show that deletions can be performed without altering weights and that the resulting state is close to a reference state that never stored the record. Experiments on 4B‑parameter models demonstrate low perplexity impact and strong evidence that deleted content is hard to recover, while larger or smaller models fail to achieve the same guarantees.

By Vishwajith Ramesh
arXiv AI
Oct 16

MemCut: Every Secret Leaves a Trail in the Long-Term Memory of LLM Agents

MemCut introduces a benchmark to test user-requested forgetting in large language model agents, featuring 456 hand-designed secrets embedded in long-horizon conversations with fully annotated evidence trails. The benchmark defines two recovery metrics—native and residual—to assess how well secrets can be retrieved after deletion. Experiments across five memory designs and four LLMs show that deletion reduces native recovery more than residual recovery, highlighting candidate coverage as a key bottleneck.

By Cheng Zhang, Xuanning Cao, Zhicheng Zheng, Hui Xiong
arXiv AI
Oct 7

The Right Memory in the Wrong Context: Verifying Retrieval Admissibility in Long-Term Agent Memory

The paper presents a retrieval‑admissibility verification framework for long‑term memory agents, classifying each memory‑query pair as admissible, inadmissible, or unresolved. It evaluates the framework on public benchmarks (RHELM and MemOps), showing improved anchor recall and reduced exact similarity errors, while also revealing that existing verifiers miss certain inadmissible exposures. The study highlights the need for separate checks on candidate support, admissibility, prompt exposure, and answer disclosure to ensure safe memory retrieval.

By Zi Wang, Xingqiao Wang, Emmanuel Addai, Devika Ambekar, Xiaowei Xu
arXiv AI
Aug 12

From Faulty Memories to Corrected Actions: Dependency-Guided Rollback Repair for Memory-Augmented Agents

arXiv:2608. 10502v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent memory lets language-model agents reuse information across sessions, but it also makes errors durable: a poisoned, stale, or misattributed record can alter reasoning, tool use, answers, and subsequent memory writes.

By Caili Yu, Yiqi Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Yiqun Duan, Mingkai Zheng, Zhangkai Wu, Kaize Shi, Taotao Cai
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

Causal Episodic Memory for Feedback-Driven Agent Repair

The paper introduces MERIT, a training‑free agent that uses an online dual‑polarity memory of oracle‑verified corrections and failed attempts to improve LLM agent repair without updating parameters. MERIT retrieves only finalized memories, classifies failures, and employs a hybrid lexical‑dense retriever before the frozen model generates revisions. Experiments with Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct show that MERIT raises execution accuracy on the Spider benchmark from 66.34 % to 69.79 % and on BIRD from 47.35 % to 48.44 %, with varying evidence across datasets.

By Khang Nhat Hoang Vo, Tam Minh Chu, Anh Trac Duc Dinh, Thuyen Vinh Ha Bui, Tho Quan