arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3
Attribution via Distributional Paths for Information Revelation
arXiv:2606. 03885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feature attribution methods explain predictions by assigning importance scores to input features.
The Attribution Contract: Feature Attribution for Generative Language Models
arXiv:2605. 23080v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Feature attribution methods promise to identify which input features matter for a model output.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11
Teaching Diffusion to Speculate Left-to-Right
arXiv:2606. 11552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, but their autoregressive decoding process incurs substantial inference costs due to inherently sequential token generation.
arXiv AI
Jun 11
From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data
arXiv:2606. 07537v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models hallucinate--producing fluent, confident, factually wrong outputs--with a consistency that persists across generations and scales.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7
How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Length
arXiv:2607. 05316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts.
arXiv AI
Jul 22
From Dependency to Compositionality: A Neurosymbolic Lifting of LLM Outputs via Combinatory Categorial Grammar
arXiv:2607. 18961v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generate fluent text by incrementally predicting the next token from a prefix.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 4
Data Attribution in Large Language Models via Bidirectional Gradient Optimization
arXiv:2606. 04928v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse applications, raising critical questions for governance, accountability, and data provenance.
arXiv AI
Jun 6
LLMs Can Leak Training Data But Do They Want To? A Propensity-Aware Evaluation of Memorization in LLMs
arXiv:2606. 06286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can reproduce training data, but existing memorization evaluations mostly measure whether models can be forced to do so, rather than whether they do so under ordinary use.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
What LLMs explain is not what they believe: Evaluating explanation sufficiency under models' own input beliefs
arXiv:2606. 28615v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, where free-text explanations such as chain-of-thought and post-hoc rationales are used to justify model outputs.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10
Teaching Diffusion to Speculate Left-to-Right
Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, but their autoregressive decoding process incurs substantial inference costs due to inherently sequential token generation. Speculative decoding addresses this bottleneck by employing a lightweight draft model to propose multiple future tokens that are subsequently verified in parallel by a larger target model.
arXiv AI
Jun 24
MGI: Member vs Generated Inference
arXiv:2606. 23872v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative models increasingly produce samples that are indistinguishable from human-created content, it becomes difficult to determine whether a given data point was part of a model's natural training set or was generated by the model itself, especially when models memorize and reproduce training data.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
SimSD: Simple Speculative Decoding in Diffusion Language Models
arXiv:2606. 02544v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) LLMs, offering faster inference through parallel or blockwise decoding.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 6
How Much is Left? LLMs Linearly Encode Their Remaining Output Length
Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts. We ask whether the model carries an internal estimate of how much response remains.