The paper introduces a multi‑view, confusion‑guided ensemble framework for synthetic image attribution, combining FFT‑ConvNeXt, DINOv2, CLIP, and Xception to capture frequency, semantic, and forensic cues. Extensive data augmentation simulates realistic post‑processing, while a binary expert classifier and class‑adaptive confidence calibration address ambiguities between similar diffusion models. The approach achieved 99.53% on the public leaderboard and 99.20% on the private leaderboard for the ICANN 2026 DLMMDD Workshop challenge.
arXiv:2607. 22808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of text-to-image (T2I) models has necessitated robust Synthetic Image Source Attribution (SIA) methodologies.
arXiv:2512.17730v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Detectors of AI-generated images tend to inherit the biases of the data they are trained on: models fitted to GAN imagery learn to treat GAN-specif...
arXiv:2606. 25375v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud.
arXiv:2609.07670v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The growing realism and accessibility of manipulated and generated faces threaten the trustworthiness of digital media. To detect such forgeries, dee...
arXiv:2606. 03348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent generative models can now produce visual artifacts with realistic embedded text and layouts, creating a new misinformation threat: synthetic credibility.
With the rapid adoption of generative AI, synthetic medical images pose growing risks, including diagnostic deception and insurance fraud. Although prior work has explored vision-language model (VLM)-based synthetic image detection, these evaluations typically consider images in isolation.
Explainable Deepfake Detection with Feature-robust Augmentation and Evidence-grounded Explanation Optimization proposes a new framework that improves deepfake detection and interpretability. The approach introduces Feature-robust Augmentation—diversified degradation-aware strategies combined with supervised contrastive learning and a mean-teacher architecture—to maintain accuracy on low-quality images. For explanations, it employs evidence-grounded preference optimization, guiding the model to focus on genuine manipulation traces by learning from chosen-rejected explanation pairs that omit evidence or inject irrelevant details. The method achieved first place in the ACM Multimedia 2026 Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge and is publicly available on GitHub.
arXiv:2607. 06254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deepfake image detection is currently served by three fundamentally different paradigms: commercial APIs, zero-shot vision-language models (LLMs), and open-source detectors.
arXiv:2607. 10580v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI models are increasingly trained on personal images scraped from social media and public platforms, often without consent, leading to serious privacy violations, such as unauthorized facial recognition and targeted advertising.
arXiv:2607. 28955v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-generated videos are becoming increasingly realistic and difficult to distinguish from authentic ones, which facilitates malicious misuse and poses growing threats to cybersecurity and social governance.
arXiv:2607. 22745v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Rapid advances in image generation are eroding the evidentiary value of visual content in settings where authenticity can affect public safety and personal reputation.
The paper introduces CLIPure, a method for building an adversarially robust zero‑shot image classifier by purifying inputs in the latent space of CLIP. It formulates purification risk using KL divergence between denoising and attack processes via bidirectional SDEs, and proposes two variants: CLIPure‑Diff, which uses a diffusion prior, and CLIPure‑Cos, which relies on cosine similarity. Experiments on CIFAR‑10, ImageNet, and 13 other datasets show significant robustness gains, raising state‑of‑the‑art performance from 71.7% to 91.1% on CIFAR‑10 and from 59.6% to 72.6% on ImageNet.