arXiv:2603.04191v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users may share individual preferences over extended interactio...
By Qianyun Guo, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi
The paper introduces the Multi-Session Personalized Tool Calling (MPT) benchmark, containing 4,695 instances across 459 multi‑session histories that test Preference Recall, Induction, and Transfer. It proposes PRefine, a test‑time memory method that refines a user’s latent preference via a generate‑verify‑refine loop. Experiments with five LLMs show that PRefine outperforms existing memory systems and even full‑history prompting on Preference Transfer, suggesting that personalized agents should encode behavior as preferences rather than merely storing past interactions.
By Yejin Yoon, Minseo Kim, Taeuk Kim
The paper introduces MemPABench, an interactive environment designed to evaluate how personal agents remember and act on user interaction preferences. The benchmark features long‑horizon tasks where agents must decide when to clarify, confirm, or act autonomously, using data from four simulated users who provided 99 sessions over four months and five preference changes each. Experiments across four memory systems and LLM backbones show that current memory approaches offer limited improvement in preference selection, with retrieval‑based methods performing no better than no memory and file‑based memory sometimes applying preferences in irrelevant contexts.
By Jialin Li, Zhenhao Chen, Hanjun Luo, Hanan Salam
The paper investigates whether using a language model’s memory to personalize responses aligns with user preferences. By collecting about 1,000 pairwise judgments from 87 participants on ChatGPT queries that included personal memories, the authors find that memory‑conditioned responses are not consistently preferred and that users sometimes strongly favor non‑memory responses. An automatic reward model trained on these judgments achieves 72.8% preference prediction accuracy and outperforms existing baselines, highlighting the need for evaluation and optimization objectives that better reflect user preferences for memory use.
By Yijiang River Dong, Zexue He, Cheng Yu, Tiancheng Hu, Michael J Ryan, Jan Batzner, Zheng Hui, Shaolong Wu, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Alex Pentland, Nigel Collier, Jiaxin Pei
arXiv:2608. 08300v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Conversational assistants increasingly rely on persistent long-term memory to personalize responses across sessions.
By Hakeem Hannoon, Andrew Zhao, Mihir Narayan, Sharvin Goyal, Ivaxi Sheth
The paper introduces CAPTURE, a system designed to help personalized language agents distinguish genuine preference changes from temporary context shifts or malicious memory poisoning. CAPTURE employs a neural differential-equation belief tracker, a multi-timescale memory ledger, uncertainty-triggered clarification, and counterfactual auditing to resolve ambiguity. Experiments on 480 episodes from 96 users show CAPTURE outperforms baseline methods, limiting poisoning success while accepting most real preference updates.
By S M Asif Hossain, Ruksat Khan Shayoni, Md Kishor Morol
arXiv:2609.34284v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Personalized LLMs must decide, for each stored preference, whether the current context calls for applying or suppressing it, which we call its appl...
By Haeun Jang, Yonghyun Jun, Hwanhee Lee
The paper introduces the concept of adaptive personalization under preference epistemic uncertainty, arguing that conversational AI must adjust its response strategy as human preferences evolve. A study shows people prefer state‑contingent strategies when uncertainty changes, and the authors build a multilingual benchmark to test language models on this task. Results reveal a recognition‑generation gap: models can choose the right strategy from options but fail to generate it correctly, defaulting to exploit‑first behavior; targeted training on internal strategy representations improves performance on out‑of‑distribution personas.
By Priyanka Dey, Rajarshi Das, Vikas Bahirwani, Qi Zeng, Julia Kruk, Qi Qi
arXiv:2608.28833v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: While Large language models (LLMs) incorporate user personalization signals to improve usability and helpfulness, they increasingly shift from providin...
By Yumeng Wang, Yuchen Wu, Cheng Qian, Zhiyuan Fan, Hyeonjeong Ha, Shujin Wu, Jiayu Liu, Heng Ji, Ge Wang
HyperTrace is a training‑free framework that personalizes large language models by tracing latent user preferences online. It maintains interpretable natural‑language hypotheses about short‑term intent and long‑term preferences, updating them with an SMC‑style reweighting process driven by an LLM‑based surrogate choice model. Experiments on PRISM and PersonaMem‑v2 demonstrate that HyperTrace improves response alignment, preference prediction, and profile consistency compared to strong online baselines.
By Jianzhi Shen, Keyu Mao, Minghao Shao, Chuanyang Jin, Yusong Wang, Ailiang Lin, Kotaro Funakoshi, Manabu Okumura, Tianmin Shu, Muhammad Shafique
arXiv:2605. 18271v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: With the rapid emergence of personal AI agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs), implementing them on-device has become essential for privacy and responsiveness.
By Changmin Lee, Jaemin Kim, Taesik Gong
arXiv:2606. 02754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalization is a crucial capability of modern language agents.
By Peixuan Han, Hongyi Du, Jiayu Liu, Yihang Sun, Yutong Liu, Jiaxuan You