arXiv AI

The Impact of Configuring Agentic AI Coding Tools on Build-vs-Buy Decisions: A Study Protocol

arXiv:2606. 03907v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI coding tools write code with increasing autonomy and in doing so decide when to import a library and when to implement functionality from scratch.

arXiv AI
3d ago

Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?

The paper introduces LibraryDesignBench, a benchmark that tests how well agents can design reusable libraries from specifications without prescribed designs. It evaluates libraries by measuring the correctness and simplicity of programs written by three different user agents across 242 programming problems in four languages. Findings show that while agents often replicate human-designed abstractions, downstream agents still tend to reimplement library features due to rigidity or usability issues, and that providing more prescriptive guidance improves reuse and program simplicity.

By Gabriel Orlanski, Alex L. Zhang, Avi Trost, Vincent Sunn Chen, Frederic Sala, Aws Albarghouthi, Ludwig Schmidt
arXiv AI
Aug 24

SDAD: Spec-Driven Agentic Development for the AI-Native SDLC

The paper introduces Spec-Driven Agentic Development (SDAD), a framework that leverages large language models to ingest extensive functional requirement documents and repository context in a single workflow, turning specification quality into the engine for autonomous software delivery. SDAD blends disciplined upfront formalisation with rapid implementation, encompassing intent capture, machine‑readable specifications, agentic synthesis, and multi‑agent verification with human sign‑off. It positions AI‑code as a fourth production paradigm, compares it to traditional Waterfall and Agile approaches, and extends the model to team role evolution, quantitative governance metrics, and a staged migration blueprint for practical adoption.

By Vu Hung Nguyen, Thanh Nguyen
arXiv AI
Sep 7

Beyond Code Generation: Reliability, Verification, and Cost Economics in the Agentic Software Development Lifecycle

The paper examines how AI coding agents are evolving beyond simple autocomplete to perform complex tasks such as repository inspection, multi-file editing, tool execution, test writing, pull request creation, and long-duration work with minimal supervision. It highlights that while these agents boost coding activity, significant bottlenecks remain in review, integration, testing, security, deployment, and production operations, and that the economics of software development are shifting toward variable token, tool, sandbox, CI, and rework costs. The authors synthesize recent research and industry data to propose four engineering concepts—Agentic SDLC Throughput Paradox, Production-Qualified Change, Verification Tax, and an Agentic SDLC Control Plane—to guide the allocation of autonomy within cost, reliability, and human-attention constraints, ultimately reframing the research focus to production-qualified value per dollar, reviewer-hour, and operational risk.

By Happy Bhati
arXiv AI
Jul 7

LLMoxie: Exploring Agentic AI for Scientific Software Development

arXiv:2607. 02703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we describe LLMoxie, an institutional AI platform whose three-tiered architecture supports multi-cloud and on-premise inference, a LiteLLM/MLflow control plane for authentication, budgeting, PII masking, and observability, and an application augmentation layer for AI coding agents.

By Landung Setiawan, Anant Mittal, Cordero Core, Anshul Tambay, Carlos Garcia Jurado Suarez, David A. C. Beck, Andrew J. Connolly, Vani Mandava