arXiv:2602. 02470v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in many complex tasks, yet they can still fail in very simple logical reasoning such as the "reversal curse" -- when trained on forward knowledge data of the form "$A \rightarrow B$" (e.
By Xutao Ma, Yixiao Huang, Hanlin Zhu, Somayeh Sojoudi
arXiv:2606. 03080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Causal language models factorize sequence probabilities using only preceding context, leaving future information unexploited during training despite its availability in the training data.
By Mingkuan Zhao, Xiayu Sun, Wentao Hu, Suquan Chen, Jiaxuan Li, Xiaoyan Zhu, Xin Lai, Jiayin Wang
arXiv:2607. 17674v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A language model $p_\theta(y \mid x)$ trained on reasoning tasks learns to solve problems via multiple distinct strategies, yet these strategies are implicit and entangled within the model's response distribution.
By Awni Altabaa, John Lafferty
arXiv:2607. 29378v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generate text by auto-regressively sampling the next token.
By Pirzada Suhail, Nagasai Saketh Naidu, Atanu R Sinha, Amit Sethi
arXiv:2510. 19990v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The reasoning paradigm, where language models reason before answering, has enabled breakthroughs on tasks such as mathematical problem-solving.
By Zachary Horvitz, Raghav Singhal, Hao Zou, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Zhou Yu, Rajesh Ranganath, Kathleen McKeown
arXiv:2606. 14943v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Causal Transformers model sequences through an autoregressive factorization of the joint distribution, which enables efficient left-to-right decoding and conditional likelihood computation.
By Yinhan Lu, Eric Elmoznino, L\'eo Gagnon, Sarthak Mittal, Tejas Kasetty, Guillaume Lajoie
arXiv:2509. 21013v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given the prohibitive cost of pre-training large language models, it is essential to leverage smaller proxy models to optimize datasets before scaling up.
By Woosung Koh, Juyoung Suk, Sungjun Han, Se-Young Yun, Jamin Shin
arXiv:2608. 06819v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Token-level collaboration allows a large language model (LLM) to assist a small language model (SLM) when their predictions diverge.
By Quanquan Li, Hongbo Zhang, Yihe Chi, Jingyu Li, Xidong Xi, Liuyang Song, Hongzhen Zhang, Yuxiang Huang, Jing Ke, Siyuan Ma, Junyi Lin, Guitao Cao
arXiv:2607. 01792v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While decoder-only LLMs excel at a vast array of natural language tasks, it suffers from an asymmetric information flow induced by causal attention: later tokens are richer in contextual grounding than earlier ones.
By Andikawati P Widjaja, Yongjun Kim, Hyounghun Kim, Jaeho Lee
arXiv:2511. 05963v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transformers replace recurrence with a memory that grows with sequence length and self-attention that enables ad-hoc lookups over past tokens.
By Jayden Teoh, Manan Tomar, Kwangjun Ahn, Edward S. Hu, Tim Pearce, Pratyusha Sharma, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Riashat Islam, Alex Lamb, John Langford
arXiv:2607. 09693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, but it requires expensive training, curated data, and reward signals.
By Zibin Meng, Peng Xie, Kani Chen
arXiv:2602. 10623v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models learned from human preferences are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning from human feedback, yet they are often vulnerable to reward hacking due to noisy annotations and systematic biases such as response length or style.
By Zhibin Duan, Guowei Rong, Zhuo Li, Bo Chen, Mingyuan Zhou, Dandan Guo