arXiv Machine Learning

Beyond Risk Prediction: Evidence Grounding and Psychosocial Factor Verification for Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment

The paper introduces a framework for explainable suicide risk assessment from social networking service posts, comprising Risk Assessment, Evidence Grounding, and Factor Identification. Risk Assessment uses length-based routing to handle varying post lengths, while Evidence Grounding highlights supporting phrases and enforces consistency with risk predictions. Factor Identification employs two verifiers—Taxonomy Verifier and Evidence-Aware Verifier—to predict psychosocial factors, achieving weighted F1 scores of 0.8088, 0.7605, and 0.5562 for the three tasks respectively.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment on Social Media with Multi-Task QLoRA

The paper presents a system for the IEEE BigData 2026 Cup on Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment on Social Media. It tackles three tasks—risk-level classification, evidence phrase extraction, and multi-label factor identification—using Qwen2.5-Instruct models adapted with quantized low-rank adaptation (QLoRA) and an answer-masked causal language-model objective. The final system achieved a composite score of 0.7738, with 0.8089 on Task 1 and 0.6919 on Task 2, demonstrating that task‑specific training and tailored aggregation improve performance across the three tasks.

By Xuan Zhong Feng, Geoffrey Martin, Hexin Dong, Yifan Peng
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 8

BEACON-SP: Ontology-Grounded GraphRAG Framework for Clinical Suicide Risk Assessment

BEACON-SP is an ontology‑grounded Graph Retrieval‑Augmented Generation framework designed to aid clinicians in suicide risk assessment by integrating diverse clinical, behavioral, social, and temporal data. It constructs patient knowledge graphs guided by a unified suicide prevention ontology that merges the Three‑Step Theory, the Integrated Motivational‑Volitional Model, and the Suicide Social Determinants of Health Ontology. In a benchmark of 1,500 queries across 15 clinical categories, BEACON‑SP outperformed a vector‑based RAG baseline in completeness, clinical relevance, and evidence grounding, with 76.4% of paired comparisons favoring the GraphRAG approach.

By Kemal Davaslioglu, Nathan Conger, Sastry Kompella, Yalin E. Sagduyu, Nathaniel D. Bastian
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Dep-LLM: Training-Free Depression Diagnosis via Evidence-Guided Structured Multi-factor with Reliable LLM Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 10796v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic Depression Detection (ADD) from clinical interviews is a pivotal task in computational mental health, yet it remains challenging due to two critical obstacles: 1) difficulty in modeling complex but sparsely distributed depression clues within lengthy, multi-topic clinical interviews, leading to superficial and unreliable reasoning; 2) scarcity of labeled data due to clinical privacy, together with high cost of training and fine-tuning, limiting the deployment of supervised ADD systems.

By Yiqing Lyu, Xianbing Zhao, Buzhou Tang, Ronghuan Jiang
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Assessing Suicide Risk in Arabic Crisis Helpline Calls: A Comparison of Arabic and English Large Language Models

The study evaluates large language models for assessing suicide risk in Arabic crisis helpline calls, comparing Arabic and English models. Using de‑identified transcripts from Lebanon’s National Lifeline, the researchers fine‑tuned instruction‑tuned LLMs and transformer encoders, achieving a macro‑F1 of 81.19 and ROC‑AUC of 90.61 for high‑risk calls in Arabic, and 85.00/92.59 in English. The results show that high‑risk calls are more distinguishable than at‑risk calls, and translating to English does not degrade performance, indicating potential for operator‑facing tools.

By Linhai Ma, Rita El Hachem, Mahatab El Hajj, Lilian Ghandour, Samah Fodeh