arXiv:2605. 10246v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI scientist systems are increasingly deployed for autonomous research, yet their academic integrity has never been systematically evaluated.
By Zonglin Yang, Xingtong Liu, Xinyan Xu
arXiv:2608. 13754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The EU AI Act requires providers of high-risk systems to file technical documentation describing how the system reaches its decisions.
By Ajay Pravin Mahale (Hochschule Trier)
arXiv:2606. 19245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to accelerate drug discovery by compressing interpretation and decision-making loops, but practical deployment requires trusted evaluation on realistic program decisions.
By Hannah Le, Ramesh Ramasamy, Alex Urrutia, Mahsa Yazdani, Tim Proctor, Kenny Workman
arXiv:2606. 31273v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI-assisted research has entered a stage in which the central question is not only whether systems can generate hypotheses, run experiments, or produce manuscripts, but whether their scientific claims are calibrated to the evidence that supports them.
By Hongmin Li
arXiv:2606. 01316v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific discovery demands intelligence, perseverance, and serendipity across vast search spaces.
By Zhe Zhao, Haibin Wen, Yingcheng Wu, Jiaming Ma, Yifan Wen, Jinglin Jian, Jiacheng Ge, Xiangru Tang, Bo An, Ming Yin, Sanfeng Wu, Mengdi Wang, Le Cong
arXiv:2608. 11252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic AI systems routinely transport conclusions across biological, clinical and financial contexts, and the emerging safeguard is local verification: checking at each step that the entity is representable in the chosen tool, that parameters are compatible, and that outputs cohere with the plan.
By Suyash Mishra