arXiv:2507. 04771v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Privacy protection laws, such as the GDPR, grant individuals the right to request the forgetting of their personal data not only from databases but also from machine learning (ML) models trained on them.
By Josep Domingo-Ferrer, Najeeb Jebreel, David S\'anchez
arXiv:2605. 11170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Noise-based certified machine unlearning currently faces a hard ceiling: the noise magnitude required to certify unlearning typically destroys model utility, particularly for large-scale deletion requests.
By Ahmed Mehdi Inane, Vincent Quirion, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Ioannis Mitliagkas
arXiv:2507. 04219v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current unlearning methods for LLMs optimize on the private information they seek to remove by incorporating it into their fine-tuning data.
By Yan Scholten, Sophie Xhonneux, Leo Schwinn, Stephan G\"unnemann
Machine unlearning aims to eliminate the influence of specific data from trained models to safeguard privacy. However, this presents a significant challenge in the context of continual learning (CL), where models update sequentially on dynamic datasets.
arXiv:2512. 04008v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Training with differential privacy (DP) guarantees dataset members that they cannot be identified by users of the released model.
By Zo\"e Ruha Bell, Anvith Thudi, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Nicolas Papernot, Shafi Goldwasser
arXiv:2606. 02119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove the influence of specific forget training data due to privacy, copyright or bias concerns while maintaining the model performance on the remaining retain data.
By Jiangwei Chen, Xinyuan Niu, Rachael Hwee Ling Sim, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low