Hugging Face Trending Papers

Statistical Non-linear Reconstruction Loss for Image Anomaly Detection

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Reconstruction-based methods are a cornerstone of unsupervised image anomaly detection, but they remain vulnerable to \emph{outlier leakage}, where standard mean squared error (MSE) loss drives the model to faithfully reconstruct anomalous patterns. We propose a Non-linear Reconstruction Loss that applies a sigmoid-based squashing function to suppress high-magnitude features, preventing outliers from dominating optimization while preserving sensitivity to normal patterns.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

CDGP: Contrastive Dual Gaussian Processes for Weakly Supervised Anomaly Segmentation

The paper introduces Contrastive Dual Gaussian Processes (CDGP), a weakly supervised approach for anomaly segmentation in industrial visual inspection. CDGP models normal and anomaly predictive distributions over dense tokens, using a posterior-dominance statistic that normalizes predictive-mean differences by joint uncertainty to provide spatial evidence and image-level confidence. The method achieves top performance on MVTec AD~2, KSDD2, and VisA datasets without requiring pixel-level annotations or test-time fitting.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 31

ShiftSplit-AD: Separating Domain Shift from Defects in Foundation-Feature Visual Anomaly Detection

ShiftSplit-AD is a method that separates domain shift from defects in visual anomaly detection by decomposing the residual matrix of DINOv2 features into low‑rank and row‑sparse components. The sparse component is used for scoring anomalies, optionally fused with the low‑rank part. Experiments on AeBAD‑S show that sparse‑only scoring raises image AUROC from 0.6780 to 0.7294 and AUPRC from 0.8052 to 0.8465, but it also lowers clean AUROC on MVTec categories and hurts Bottle localization, highlighting a trade‑off between filtering shift and preserving defect information.

By Muhamathu Ameer Ali Aacaas Muhamath
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16

Localized Kernel Projection Outlyingness: A Two-Stage Approach for Multi-Modal Outlier Detection

arXiv:2510. 24043v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper presents Two-Stage LKPLO, a novel multi-stage outlier detection framework that overcomes the coexisting limitations of conventional projection-based methods: their reliance on a fixed statistical metric and their assumption of a single data structure.

By Akira Tamamori
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 7

Training-Free Logical and Structural Anomaly Detection via Calibrated Fusion

The paper introduces a training‑free anomaly detector that simultaneously handles structural and logical defects by calibrating heterogeneous anomaly cues with statistics from normal images. This calibration aligns frozen representations, allowing their fusion without extra training or part‑level supervision. The resulting method achieves state‑of‑the‑art AUROC scores on MVTec‑LOCO and remains competitive on MVTec‑AD.

By Changyi Li, Miao Yu, Kai Dong, Yu Xiao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Can We Predict Anomaly Detection Performance from Embedding-Space Geometry?

The paper investigates whether the performance of anomaly detection systems can be predicted without labeled anomalies. For kNN-based detectors, it derives a lower bound on AUC that links detection performance to the separation and variance of inlier and outlier scores, and uses this to analyze how density variation, intrinsic dimensionality, and domain mismatch affect score variability. The authors introduce pseudo‑anomaly probes that provide a reference for estimating relative score separation, and demonstrate through experiments on DCASE benchmarks that these probes enable anomaly‑free model selection to outperform conventional development‑set selection, especially under domain shift.

By Kevin Wilkinghoff, Zheng-Hua Tan