arXiv:2607. 02197v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The society and emerging risk-based regulatory frameworks for AI underscore the need for rigorous risk assessment to ensure safe and reliable AI systems.
By Javier Irigoyen, Roberto Daza, Aythami Morales, Julian Fierrez, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Francisco Jurado, Alvaro Ortigosa
arXiv:2408. 02379v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Developing and certifying safe - or so-called trustworthy - AI has become an increasingly salient issue, especially in light of upcoming regulation such as the EU AI Act.
By Benjamin Fresz, Vincent Philipp G\"obels, Safa Omri, Danilo Brajovic, Andreas Aichele, Janika Kutz, Jens Neuh\"uttler, Marco F. Huber
arXiv:2606. 28929v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cybersecurity is a real-life test-bed for many machine learning problems at once, especially when considering modern strides in using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate processes as ``agents.
By Edward Raff, Maor Ashkenazi, Sagar Samtani, David J. Elkind, Sven Krasser
arXiv:2606. 05710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing penetrations of the critical infrastructure sector in the United States with intelligent digital technologies have greatly increased exposure to advanced cyber adversaries and operational vulnerabilities.
By B. M. Taslimul Haque, Md. Arifur Rahman, Md. Serajul Kabir Chowdhury Rubel, Md. Iqbal Hossan
arXiv:2605. 16281v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Post-deployment accountability has become central to AI governance, yet little empirical evidence shows whether monitoring, incident reporting, and impact assessment obligations are visible when AI systems fail.
By Ummara Mumtaz, Summaya Mumtaz
arXiv:2607. 16112v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Frontier AI companies have published capability thresholds that differ substantially, making it difficult for third parties to verify whether a threshold has been crossed or to compare requirements across companies.
By Wilber Sean Anterola, Matthew Ball, Luis F. Lafuerza, Markov Grey