arXiv AI By Lea Roxanne Muth, Marian Margraf

Reverse Engineering Compliance: A Dual-Graph Verification Framework for Auditing Legacy IT Security Concepts

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 08292v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The NIS-2 Directive increases the need for continuous, auditable compliance evidence and motivates a shift from document-based compliance toward machine-readable compliance artifacts.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3

CTRAG: An In-Context Retrieval-based Framework for Automated Compliance Checking using LLMs

Trust is fundamental in modern regulatory ecosystems, and compliance checking plays a critical role in fostering that trust. Regulatory compliance verification is essential for businesses operating in highly controlled environments, as it ensures alignment with sector-specific guidelines across domains such as financial reporting, data privacy, and cybersecurity.

arXiv AI
Sep 4

Beyond Reproducibility: Towards Security-Aware Evaluation of Research Artifacts

The paper "Beyond Reproducibility: Towards Security-Aware Evaluation of Research Artifacts" examines 1,388 research artifacts from top security conferences, uncovering 132,431 candidate security findings through static analysis. It introduces a taxonomy for context-aware security assessment and presents SAFE, an autonomous framework that accurately distinguishes security-relevant findings and classifies risk types. The study demonstrates that nearly 45% of findings are security-relevant, highlighting the need for security-aware evaluation alongside traditional reproducibility checks.

By Nanda Rani, Christian Rossow
arXiv AI
2d ago

A Deterministic and Auditable AI Security Risk Assessment Framework with ATLAS Aligned Executable Rules and Formal Verification

The paper introduces a deterministic AI security risk assessment framework that transforms diverse engineering artefacts into a standardized Control ID taxonomy scored on a four‑level ordinal scale. It compiles technique‑level predicates from a fixed MITRE ATLAS snapshot, linking each control to mitigation and producing traceable feasibility and impact outputs. The framework is formally verified for boundedness, totality, consistency, and monotonicity, and is evaluated on five open‑source AI projects, showing that strengthened controls lower feasibility scores while residual risks persist when core controls are missing.

By Yixuan Huang (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK), Basel Halak (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK), Boojoong Kang (University of Southampton, Southampton, UK)