LoRA-TSD introduces a new optimizer for low‑rank adaptation (LoRA) that treats each update as a tangent vector on the fixed‑rank matrix manifold and applies a Muon‑style spectral‑norm steepest‑descent step within that tangent space. The method avoids costly full‑matrix operations and offers a retraction that is up to 2.8× cheaper than previous manifold approaches. The authors prove that their surrogate recovers LoRA‑Pro, identify the Riemannian gradient as the natural stationarity measure, and provide the first global convergence guarantees for both LoRA‑Pro and LoRA‑TSD, achieving superior performance across multiple benchmarks with Llama and Qwen models.
By Dmitrii Andriianov, Andrey Veprikov, Aleksandr Beznosikov
arXiv:2606. 12120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low-rank optimal transport (OT) mitigates the quadratic scaling of classical solvers, yet existing approaches rely heavily on first-order mirror-descent updates that require careful hyperparameter tuning and ignore the optimization landscape's curvature.
By Pratik Jawanpuria, Bamdev Mishra
arXiv:2607. 06723v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Adaptive optimizers carry hidden states that change how visible gradients become parameter motion.
By Zavier Li
arXiv:2607. 08380v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An important quantity in the theory of gradient descent (GD) is the \emph{sharpness}, defined as the largest eigenvalue of the objective Hessian.
By Lachlan Ewen MacDonald, Ren\'e Vidal
arXiv:2607. 22004v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Energy natural gradient descent (ENGD) aligns parameter updates with the curvature of an underlying function-space energy, but existing formulations assume an unconstrained Euclidean parameter domain.
By Zhangyong Liang, Huanhuan Gao
arXiv:2606. 00542v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Shampoo-style optimizers approximate gradient covariance matrices using Kronecker-factored structures.
By Bing Liu, Wenjie Zhou, Chengcheng Zhao