arXiv AI By Preet Baxi, Jiannan Xu, Jane Yi Jiang, Stefanus Jasin

Prompt Injection in Automated R\'esum\'e Screening with Large Language Models: Single and Multi-Injection Settings

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 27287v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to screen and rank job applicants, creating incentives for candidates to strategically manipulate algorithmic hiring systems.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Decision Hijacking: Prompt Injection Attacks on Jev's Typed Probabilistic Decisions

The paper investigates prompt injection attacks on Jev, a non‑generative decision model, using 510 reconstructed cases. It finds that malicious prompts can shift Jev’s action probabilities, though rarely cause it to choose the attacker’s target. Techniques such as override markers mitigate influence, while adaptive attacks that use score feedback roughly double the highest attacker‑target probability and increase success rates on new validation calls from 1.8% to 3.5%.

By Tiantong Wu, Wei Yang Bryan Lim
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

Lower-Resource, Higher Scores: Language Bias in LLM Evaluators

The paper demonstrates that large language model (LLM) evaluators, whether reward‑model based or prompted LLM‑as‑a‑Judge, exhibit significant language bias in multilingual settings. Experiments with semantically identical instruction‑response pairs across 23 languages reveal that lower‑resource languages receive higher scores, a bias that persists across eight open‑weight evaluators and is not detectable by standard pairwise accuracy metrics. The authors link the bias to model uncertainty and language identity, showing it cannot be explained by content difficulty alone.

By Ej Zhou, Lucas Resck, Zheng Hui, Anna Korhonen