arXiv:2606. 05408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When an LLM repeatedly mutates a program, does it explore new forms or circle back to the same ones?
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
Program evolution can measure whether a mutation helped, but it rarely controls how far the mutation moves in behavior space. Syntactic edit size is an unreliable proxy: a small code change can alter nearly every action, while a larger rewrite can preserve the same execution trace.
arXiv:2608. 10196v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Program evolution can measure whether a mutation helped, but it rarely controls how far the mutation moves in behavior space.
arXiv:2606. 26173v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work shows that Large Language Models (LLMs) can act as semantic mutation operators for the evolutionary discovery of programs and proofs.
Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains. However, existing LLM-driven evolutionary frameworks largely discard such knowledge, repeatedly rediscovering similar ideas and limiting opportunities for cross-run and cross-task learning.
arXiv:2608. 10795v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Successful mutation strategies in evolutionary code search may contain reusable knowledge that is useful beyond a single run, and in some cases may transfer across related tasks and domains.
arXiv:2608. 07645v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-improving coding agents that iteratively rewrite their own source code have demonstrated impressive performance on coding tasks.