arXiv AI By Sofi Gjing Jovanovska, Kuntal Ghosh, Daniel Muhu Njenga, Ahmed Mufassir, Shadan Sadeghian

Man, Machine, and Masterpiece: Artistic Ownership in the AI Era

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 15027v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of AI-driven systems in creative work has sparked debates among artists and legal communities about notions of ownership.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

Ownership in AI-Assisted Everyday Tasks

The study investigates when work done with AI feels like one's own, using a qualitative survey where participants described tasks that felt owned versus not owned. Findings show that ownership depends on the collaboration process: people feel ownership when they lead, iterate, or rewrite, but disown work when merely approving AI suggestions. Ownership also extends to tasks where people set the vision but rely on AI for execution, yet loss of personal voice and lack of comprehension erode ownership, and willingness to disclose AI use is driven more by community norms than by pride.

By Megan Wei, Melanie Subbiah, Audrey Lee, Annya Dahmani, Dave Edwards, Helen Edwards, Ellie Pavlick
arXiv AI
Jun 26

Dream machine -- the next creative economy

arXiv:2606. 26114v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We examine the structural transformation of creative industries under generative artificial intelligence, drawing on 374 primary sources spanning policy documents, industry data, creator surveys, and platform analytics.

By Peter Woodbridge, John J. O'Hare
arXiv AI
Sep 25

When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration

The paper examines how AI involvement in human collaboration can lead to unowned judgment, where decisions shaped by AI lack a clear accountable human or institution. Through cases of AI-assisted peer review and concealed AI use in creative work, it shows that contribution dissolution weakens responsibility and that fear of losing credit can deter disclosure. The authors argue for clearer distinctions of AI roles, identification of judgments needing human ownership, and conditions that allow disclosure without penalty, aiming to make AI-shaped contributions discussable, creditable, contestable, and repairable.

By Hengzhi Ye
arXiv AI
Jul 10

ArtMine: Discovering and Formalizing Artistic Processes

arXiv:2607. 08331v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how artworks are created requires reasoning about the iterative decisions, material operations, and contextual influences that shape artistic production.

By Kaustubh Kumar, Ashutosh Ranjan, Vivek Srivastava, Blessin Varkey, Shirish Karande