arXiv Machine Learning By Xiao Han, Jingjing Liu, Moxuan Zheng, Zhen Zhang, Chenyu Wu

Interpretable vs Learned Encoders for High-Cardinality Fraud Detection

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 00477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A total of seven categorical encoding methods were tested on the IEEE-CIS fraud benchmark dataset (590,540 records, 3.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 8

Multi-Class vs. Multi-Label BERT for CVE-to-CWE Mapping: How Taxonomy Structure Shapes the Errors

Assigning Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) categories to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) records remains an important but largely manual step in vulnerability analysis. We study this task as a text classification problem and compare two modelling choices: a \emph{multi-class} formulation that predicts a single CWE per CVE and a \emph{multi-label} formulation that allows multiple assignments.