arXiv:2607. 07773v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: EEG-based emotion recognition is critical for mental health monitoring and affective brain-computer interfaces, yet existing deep learning approaches often treat emotion classes as isolated labels, ignoring their psychological interdependencies.
By Dongyang Kuang, Zizheng Ma, Yushan Zhang, Xiaocong Zeng
arXiv:2608.22387v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Wearable and smartphone-based emotion recognition (WER) remains a challenging setting in affective computing, due to the notorious difficulty and bia...
By Ioannis N. Ziogas, Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis, Ahsan H. Khandoker, Aamna Al Shehhi
arXiv:2607. 02063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used to capture spatial functional connectivity patterns to improve electroencephalography (EEG)-based depression recognition performance.
By Yang Li, Pan Hu, Yan Zhang, Wenfan Yang, Tao Wu, Lianbo Guo
arXiv:2607. 03587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose NetinfoGC, a framework for graph classification that extends the Network Usable Information (NUI) paradigm to graph-level learning.
By Abdullah Shaik, Anwar Said
arXiv:2511. 04539v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In network neuroscience, functional brain systems are often characterized using separate yet related graph-theoretic or spectral descriptors, overlooking how these properties covary and partially overlap across individuals and conditions.
By Subati Abulikemu, Tiago Azevedo, Michail Mamalakis, John Suckling
The paper evaluates deep learning models for electrocardiogram‑based emotion recognition, focusing on generalization across datasets rather than dataset‑specific performance. It introduces two open‑source tools—ARRC for standardized benchmarking and ARDT for inter‑dataset training—to merge three public AER datasets (CUADS, ASCERTAIN, DREAMER) into a more variable benchmark. Using these tools, the authors compare three prominent deep learning architectures and two CNN baselines with hyperparameter tuning and 10‑fold cross‑validation, revealing trade‑offs between accuracy and model complexity and providing a reproducible benchmark for future research.
By Timothy C Sweeney-Fanelli, Ajan Ahmed, Masudul Imtiaz