arXiv Machine Learning By Saksham Bassi, Sharvi Tomar

Geometry of Ordinal Representations in Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 04167v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work showed that language models represent character counts on curved 1D manifolds, with attention heads performing geometric transformations to enable computation.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 5

Geometry of Ordinal Representations in Language Models

Recent work showed that language models represent character counts on curved 1D manifolds, with attention heads performing geometric transformations to enable computation. We test whether this generalizes across four ordinal tasks (bracket depth, indentation, table position, numeric magnitude) in Gemma-2-2B, Gemma-2-9B, and Qwen3-4B.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 7

Beneath the Surface of Chains-of-Thought: A Mechanistic Interpretation of Reasoning Operations in LLMs

The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) organize reasoning operations—such as problem formulation, goal decomposition, and deduction—within their hidden representation spaces. It shows that these operations are separable in held‑out representations, with peak separability in middle layers, and that token‑wise alignment of operations becomes more distributed across spans as layers deepen. Attention‑masking experiments reveal that representations aligned to operations at chunk onsets depend on prior reasoning context, indicating a geometric correspondence between linguistic reasoning expressions and internal model structure.

By Seogyeong Jeong, Jaehui Hwang, Dongyoon Han, Geonmo Gu, Alice Oh, Taekyung Kim
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Give it Space! Explicit Disentangling of Positional and Semantic Representations in Encoders

The paper proposes an encoder Transformer that explicitly separates semantic, absolute positional (AP), and relative positional (RP) information, restricting the masked‑language‑modeling objective to the semantic stream. This disentanglement reveals that the AP subspace collapses into a low‑frequency two‑dimensional manifold reflecting document structure, that attention heads specialize into structure‑ and semantic‑oriented groups with RP supporting only the latter, and that standard positional encodings fail to robustly encode macroscopic structure. The approach preserves positional encoding and improves performance on 49 out of 65 linguistic phenomena in the Flash‑Holmes probing benchmark.

By Pierre-Antoine Lequeu, Camille Barboule, Benjamin Piwowarski