Hugging Face Trending Papers

Future Rendering $\neq$ Future Surface: A Benchmark and Dataset for Dynamic Surface Reconstruction Beyond the Observed Window

Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →

Dynamic-scene reconstruction is almost always evaluated inside the observed time window, yet deployment settings such as AR overlays, robot interaction, and anticipatory planning need the future surface: the geometry at times beyond those captured. No standard benchmark measures this.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Hugging Face Trending Papers.

arXiv AI
Sep 23

SE(3) Neural Potential Fields for 6-DoF Trajectory Planning Directly from Images Without Explicit 3D Reconstruction

The paper introduces SE(3) neural potential fields that learn collision‑free 6‑DoF trajectory planning directly from posed RGB images, eliminating the need for explicit 3D reconstruction. By supervising the field with a navigation function based on geodesic distances to the grasp, the method avoids the classic pitfalls of artificial potential fields, achieving near‑goal convergence within 3 cm from any start and producing collision‑free paths on a UR10 robot. Experiments on two tabletop scenes show significant improvements in clearance, reduced arm‑link contacts, and a 90 % grasp success rate, while planning time drops from over a minute to about 2 seconds compared to RRT* on a reconstructed scene.

By Jeffrey Eiyike, Masoud Ataei, Elvis Gyaase, Vikas Dhiman
arXiv AI
Sep 1

RoboPhys-3D: A Comprehensive Embodied World Model Evaluation via 3D Reconstruction

RoboPhys-3D is a 3D‑grounded embodied world model benchmark built on RoboTwin 2.0, featuring 50 manipulation tasks, 5,000 episodes, and 25,000 multi‑view ground‑truth videos. It evaluates video world models by processing both generated and ground‑truth videos through the same 3D reconstruction pipeline, allowing the separation of reconstruction‑induced from generation‑induced errors. The benchmark defines 50 metrics across four sub‑dimensions—pixel fidelity, 3D geometry consistency, state understanding, and task completeness—and introduces the Average Full Score and RoboPhyscore for holistic assessment, with RoboPhyscore showing strong correlation with human judgments.

By Tianyi Wang, Jiazhou Chen, Yiming Xu, Xiangyu Li, Tianyi Zeng, Chih-Hsien Chou, Ning Lu, Liang Peng, Junfeng Jiao, Christian Claudel