arXiv Machine Learning By Amel Bennaceur, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur, Prince Mercy, Bashar Nuseibeh, Faeq Alrimawi

From Failure to Alignment: A Requirements Engineering Framework for Machine Learning Systems

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 31589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Organisations designing, developing, and deploying machine learning systems (MLS) need to be able to check that these systems are trustworthy, and communicate this clearly to their stakeholders, be they different categories of users, engineers, or wider society.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

Evaluating LLM-Based Goal Extraction in Requirements Engineering: Prompting Strategies and Their Limitations

arXiv:2604. 22207v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Due to the textual and repetitive nature of many Requirements Engineering (RE) artefacts, Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven useful to automate their generation and processing.

By Anna Arnaudo, Riccardo Coppola, Maurizio Morisio, Flavio Giobergia, Andrea Bioddo, Angelo Bongiorno, Luca Dadone
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 28

Model-Driven Requirements Configuration with Three-Valued Uncertainty Scoring

Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer natural-language flexibility for automated requirements elicitation but frequently generate structurally invalid requirements and logical inconsistencies, lacking formal correctness guarantees. Objectives: This study aims to eliminate logical inconsistencies and enforce structural conformance in LLM-generated requirements while quantifying the LLM's pre-validation decision uncertainty within a formal domain model.