arXiv:2607. 29058v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Professional-document review is a constraint-checking problem in which decisions depend on relations among text, geometry, pages, and document revisions.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 27383v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as research assistants, yet it remains unclear whether they can calibrate research takeaways to the strength and scope of the supporting evidence.
Transforming table-form documents into machine-processable records requires recovering not only their visible content but also the multilevel structure that organizes it. However, existing benchmarks evaluate either holistic document outputs or conventional table grids, and their aggregate scores provide little insight into where structural failures occur.
arXiv:2606. 29399v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reviewing nuclear regulatory documents requires multi-hop reasoning across tens of thousands of pages, where judgments depend on evidence assembled across multiple chapters.
arXiv:2607. 09328v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Answering complex questions over long documents frequently requires integrating evidence that the source itself disperses naturally across distant passages.
arXiv:2607. 29677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise workflows increasingly rely on agents for \emph{schema-guided extraction}: given a document and a user-defined schema, the agent faithfully follows the schema to produce the correct output with source evidence as grounding metadata.
arXiv:2607. 14117v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-version differencing of scientific documents is essential in scholarly publishing and technical documentation, but remains challenging because scientific documents are page-structured artifacts containing heterogeneous elements such as text, tables, formulas, figures, and layout cues.