arXiv AI By Tien-Huy Nguyen, Minh-Nhat Nguyen, Nguyen Nhat Huy, Hung Viet Nguyen, Huy Nguyen Minh Nhat, Thanh-Huy Nguyen, Cuong Tuan Nguyen, Hoang M. Le, Dat Nguyen, Phat Kim Huynh, Min Xu, Ulas Bagci

ESC: Emotional Self-Correction for Reliable Vision-Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 02089v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to unreliable reasoning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

I Don't Miss You, but I Do: Self-Explanation Faithfulness of Modality Missingness in Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces an interventional protocol to assess how vision‑language models (VLMs) explain the impact of missing modalities on their predictions. By comparing the models’ self‑explanations with actual changes observed after restoring missing inputs, the study finds that VLMs routinely overstate the sufficiency of available evidence and underestimate the effect of adding back missing modalities. Across eight open‑weight VLMs and four tasks, the discrepancy between predicted and realized changes is substantial, revealing systematic mischaracterization of modality dependence.

By Aydin Javadov, Daniel Schoess, Florian von Wangenheim
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 10

Perception Before Supervision: Self-Contained Visual Distillation from Counterfactual Blind Spots

Self-improvement for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is typically driven by reward-based methods that provide only coarse scalar feedback. Distillation offers a richer alternative through dense token-level supervision, but in the visual domain it usually depends on privileged context constructed using external annotations and tools, or stronger models.