arXiv:2606. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have enabled atomistic simulations across broad regions of chemical and materials space, but many remain computationally expensive and lack explicit electrostatics, limiting their use for systems governed by long-range interactions and electrical response.
By Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng
arXiv:2603. 14700v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become widely used tools in atomistic simulations.
By William J. Baldwin, Ilyes Batatia, Martin Vondr\'ak, Johannes T. Margraf, G\'abor Cs\'anyi
arXiv:2607. 14486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows.
By Sheng Bi, Yi-Ze Wang, Jun Cheng
arXiv:2606. 15892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate interatomic potentials enable molecular dynamics of materials, molecules, and interfaces beyond density-functional-theory length and time scales.
By Jia Bi, Alin Marin Elena, Samuel Pinilla
arXiv:2602. 04861v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) sometimes fail to reproduce the physical smoothness of the quantum potential energy surface (PES), leading to erroneous behavior in downstream simulations that standard energy and force regression evaluations can miss.
By Ryan Liu, Eric Qu, Tobias Kreiman, Samuel M. Blau, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan
arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.
By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik