arXiv:2503. 17020v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Kernel methods compare inputs through feature maps.
By Joachim Tomasi, Sandrine Anthoine, Hachem Kadri
arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.
By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
arXiv:2607. 10656v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Characterizing quantum topological phases requires measuring non-local string order parameters, demanding access to the full system, which is often experimentally unfeasible.
By Mehran Khosrojerdi, Sougato Bose, Alessandro Cuccoli, Paola Verrucchi, Abolfazl Bayat, Leonardo Banchi
arXiv:2607. 19782v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Kernel methods are powerful tools in machine learning but commonly used full-Gram kernels face three key limitations: (1) quadratic scaling with training set size; (2) the use of fixed, non-trainable kernels; and (3) the absence of an intrinsic formulation for multiclass classification.
By Kilian Tscharke, Pascal Debus
arXiv:2606. 02785v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large machine learning models benefit substantially from multimodal inputs that provide a complementary view of the same example.
By Aritra Bal, Michael Binder, Markus Klute, Benedikt Maier, Michael Spannowsky
arXiv:2412. 09557v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Quantum kernel learning (QKL) promises efficient machine learning by encoding feature maps onto exponentially large Hilbert spaces inherent in quantum systems.
By Vivek Sabarad, Vishal Varma, T. S. Mahesh