arXiv:2503. 17020v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Kernel methods compare inputs through feature maps.
By Joachim Tomasi, Sandrine Anthoine, Hachem Kadri
arXiv:2508. 19437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The importance of analyzing nontrivial datasets when testing quantum machine learning (QML) models is becoming increasingly prominent in literature, yet a cohesive framework for understanding dataset characteristics remains elusive.
By Alona Sakhnenko, Christian B. Mendl, Jeanette M. Lorenz
arXiv:2510. 03389v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current quantum computers require algorithms that use limited resources economically.
By Jonas J\"ager, Philipp Els\"asser, Elham Torabian
arXiv:2608. 19304v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lung cancer screening with low-dose chest computed tomography reduces mortality, but its impact is limited by uptake, adherence, and management challenges.
By Hamed Javidi, Alex Zajichek, Hakan Doga, Laxmi Parida, Filippo Utro, Peter J. Mazzone
arXiv:2607. 11701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship ($\mathtt{QSAR}$) modeling is a foundational computational methodology in early-stage drug discovery, heavily relied upon for predicting compound toxicity, bioavailability, and therapeutic potential.
By Mariano Caruso, Daniel Ruiz, Alejandro Giraldo, Guido Bellomo
The paper investigates quantum machine learning (QML) for magnetic-field estimation using nitrogen‑vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. By framing sensing as a supervised regression task, the authors compare classical machine learning models trained on measurement‑based data with quantum kernel‑based models trained on pre‑measurement coherent quantum states. They find that QML performance improves markedly when coherent quantum‑state information is available, whereas changes in model complexity or learning paradigm have little effect, highlighting the need for tightly integrated quantum‑sensor and QML pipelines.
By Sounak Bhowmik, Himanshu Thapliyal