arXiv AI By Przemys{\l}aw Czuma

Em-ergence of the em-dash: a population-level rise in em-dash frequency in medRxiv preprints at the dawn of the large-language-model era

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 29540v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can leave subtle stylistic traces in assisted text; one of the most cited is the em-dash (Unicode U+2014).

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 24

The Divergence Hypothesis: Unmasking Lexical Interference and Label Bias in Mental Health NLP

The paper introduces TSS (Triple-Stream Stress probe), a diagnostic framework that splits text into lexical, morpho-syntactic, and psycholinguistic style channels to analyze mental health NLP classifiers. Across four English datasets, TSS uncovers a lexical interference effect where adding lexical features harms performance on human-labeled data but not on auto-labeled data, and proposes the Degree of Divergence (DoD) statistic to audit label-source bias. The study demonstrates that style features largely remain effective even after masking content words, emphasizing that shortcut learning is label-source specific rather than clinically relevant.

By Moustafa Yehia Hassan
arXiv AI
Jun 2

Examine Clinicians' Modification of Hedging Language in Ambient AI Documentation: A Comparative Study of AI Drafts and Final Notes

arXiv:2606. 00018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambient AI documentation systems generate clinical note drafts that clinicians frequently revise before signing off into electronic health records, yet how these edits alter hedging language remains unclear.

By Yiliang Zhou, Yawen Guo, Di Hu, Sairam Sutari, Emilie Chow, Steven Tam, Danielle Perret, Deepti Pandita, Kai Zheng