ACE introduces a training‑free, calibration‑free framework for adaptive expert skipping in Mixture‑of‑Experts LLMs. It combines a Global Spectral Proxy that estimates global transformation capacity with a Router‑Conditioned Refinement that builds expert‑specific direction prototypes, enabling the model to skip low‑contribution experts while always keeping the top‑1 expert. Offline computation of expert statistics leaves only lightweight table lookups during inference, and experiments on three MoE‑based LLMs show ACE outperforms static and dynamic baselines, especially at high skipping ratios.
By Zukang Xu, Zhixiong Zhao, Xing Hu, Jiangyong Yu, Houji Wen, Jun Li, Zhe Jiang, Dawei Yang
arXiv:2607. 24665v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern large language models scale successfully by pairing capacity growth with efficiency, keeping per-token and deployment costs under control as capacity grows.
By Yanhao Jia, Jiepeng Wang, Haibin Huang, Chi Zhang, Erik Cambria, Xuelong Li
MetaNet is a support‑set controller that predicts, for each layer of a Mixture‑of‑Experts model, an expert‑retention threshold and a bounded routing bias while keeping the backbone, experts, and router frozen. On DeepSeek‑MoE‑16B‑Chat, MetaNet offers a tunable trade‑off between accuracy and expert activation: a conservative setting activates 3.61 experts on average (40% fewer than a fixed k=6) with comparable MMLU accuracy, whereas an aggressive setting activates only 2.28 experts (62% fewer) with a modest accuracy drop. The MMLU‑trained controller also transfers to C‑Eval, activating 2.90 experts on average (52% fewer than fixed k=6) at 0.386 accuracy.
By Rongfeng Wang, Shichao Weng, Zhiqiang Wang, Xinyu Liu, Yang Yi, Peilong Zhou, Hongwei Tang
arXiv:2608. 07890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models decouple total parameters from per-token compute, but deployment still requires storing every expert.
By Ali Janati, Kaoutar El Maghraoui, Xinyi Luo, Wenyuan Shen, Owen Zou, Yankai Mao
arXiv:2505. 17639v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer dynamic computation, but are typically deployed as static full-capacity models, missing opportunities for deployment-specific specialization.
By Zehua Pei, Ying Zhang, Hui-Ling Zhen, Tao Yuan, Xianzhi Yu, Zhenhua Dong, Sinno Jialin Pan, Mingxuan Yuan, Bei Yu
The paper investigates a dense analogue of Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models by using $K$ SwiGLU experts that are all active for every token and combined via a softmax gate, keeping the total feed‑forward network (FFN) width fixed. Validation loss shows a non‑monotonic relationship with $K$: $K=2$ slightly improves performance over the single‑expert baseline, while $K=4$ and $K=6$ degrade it. The study also finds that the gating mechanism remains largely soft and balanced, except for a near one‑hot routing in the first layer of the $K=4$ model, which is functionally important as forcing uniform routing increases loss significantly.
By Vu Quang Hoang, Nghia Hieu Nguyen