arXiv:2506. 17337v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown promise in automating image diagnosis and interpretation in clinical settings.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2511. 18676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current vision-language models (VLMs) in medicine are primarily designed for categorical question answering (e.
As vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical AI, existing benchmarks mainly focus on evaluating their diagnosis ability over given medical images and texts, implicitly assuming that standardized medical images, texts or question-answer pairs are already prepared. However, this assumption does not hold when we apply VLMs in real clinical practice, where medical data is often raw, heterogeneous, and fragmented across different sources.
arXiv:2609.32352v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown increasing potential for medical image understanding, yet their capabilities in ophthalmic imaging r...
arXiv:2608. 15580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable endoscopic polyp reporting requires integrating quantitative lesion sizing, standardized Paris classification, and clinically meaningful morphological description within a single record.
arXiv:2609.38362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative vision-language models (VLMs) such as Qwen-VL and LLaVA achieve strong zero-shot performance on tasks overlapping with their pretraining dis...
The paper introduces the Medical Data Standardization Benchmark (MDS‑Bench), which evaluates vision‑language models (VLMs) on their ability to process raw, heterogeneous medical data. Models must identify source formats, convert raw images into VLM‑compatible inputs, extract relevant text, and organize the results into structured image‑text pairs. Experiments show that even the top VLM, Gemini 3 Flash, achieves only a 48.6% end‑to‑end success rate, underscoring the challenge of raw data standardization in clinical settings.