arXiv AI By Jonathan Sadeghi, Jenny Seidenschwarz, Jesse Allardice, Sirish Srinivasan, Benjamin Graham, Jeffrey Hawke

CaliBench: Are the Stochastic Dynamics of Video World Models Physically Calibrated?

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 16829v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video world models approximate the stochastic distribution of physical outcomes through generative sampling, but existing benchmarks score individual generations or compare distributions coarsely over a whole dataset, leaving the fine-grained aleatoric uncertainty of specific phenomena untested.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22

Human-Level Accuracy, Non-Human Strategies: Revealing Model-Human Divergence in Video Physical Reasoning

Video foundation models now match human accuracy on physical‑reasoning benchmarks, but a new distributional evaluation framework shows that their predictions diverge markedly from human judgments. On the Physion benchmark, ViT‑L models such as V‑JEPA2, VideoMAE‑v2, and DINOv2 achieve near‑human accuracy yet exhibit a 26.4% model‑human disagreement, far above the 4.8% human‑human disagreement, and lower agreement (kappa ~0.48 vs. 0.91). The divergence varies by task: models excel at geometric reasoning but lag on gravitational dynamics and causal chains, indicating they rely on statistical regularities rather than explicit forward simulation.

By Fanhong Li, Shurui Zheng, Zi Yin, Junbo Cui, Lei Ji, Jia Liu
arXiv AI
Aug 28

PAWBench: How Far Are We from Probabilistically Aligned World Modeling?

PAWBench introduces a benchmark to evaluate whether video generation models can act as probabilistically aligned world models, meaning they should reproduce not just plausible trajectories but the full distribution of possible behaviors from the same initial conditions. The authors formalize probabilistic alignment as a distributional criterion and provide PAWEval, an outcome-level protocol that turns repeated video rollouts into empirical distributions over physical behaviors. Across 50 scenarios and eleven current systems, none consistently matched reference probabilities or captured the full range of valid behaviors, highlighting a significant gap in current video generators.

By Yuandong Pu, Le Zhuo, Sayak Paul, Gabriel Jorge Menezes, Avram {\DJ}or{\dj}evi\'c, Shiyang Li, Yifan Zhou, Bin Fu, Wenlong Zhang, Junjun He, Yu Qiao, Yihao Liu, Jingbo Xing, Xi Chen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

New Evidence, Same Choice: Testing Physical Experiment Selection in Vision Language Models

The paper introduces a new benchmark for vision‑language models that tests their ability to decide whether to answer a physics question immediately or to request additional experimental evidence. Each problem presents one measurement image and four possible physical worlds defined by two masses and two values of another property; the model must either stop and answer or choose the cheapest experiment that resolves the question. Across six open models and 144 parameter sets, the models almost always repeat the same action even when the optimal choice changes, and only a single model gets both decisions correct on 5.9% of cases.

By Sourajit Saha, Shubhashis Roy Dipta, Nobin Sarwar, Shaswati Saha, Yuxuan Jiang, Siyuan Li, Qiheng Wang