arXiv:2505. 12239v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In Continual Learning (CL), using a Pre-Trained Model (PTM) as the feature extractor has become a popular practice.
By Yajiang Huang, Jianheng Tang, Kejia Fan, Huiping Zhuang, Anfeng Liu, Tian Wang, Yunhuai Liu, Mianxiong Dong, Houbing Herbert Song
arXiv:2608. 04255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph inference over relational data can expose sensitive edge information, and this risk becomes more severe in dynamic graphs, where repeated model updates cause privacy loss to accumulate.
By Yuyang Xia, Ruixuan Liu, Li Xiong
arXiv:2311.16139v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become indispensable tools for learning from graph structured data, catering to various applications such a...
By Zeyu Song, Ehsanul Kabir, Shagufta Mehnaz
arXiv:2504. 01219v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural networks are notorious for forgetting old skills when taught new ones - a problem known as catastrophic forgetting.
By Grzegorz Rype\'s\'c
arXiv:2607. 08659v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown considerable success in learning from graph-structured data, but their use in privacy-sensitive areas remains difficult because graph structure can leak sensitive link information.
By Wenxiu Ding, Muzhi Liu, Zheng Yan, Mingjun Wang, Yifan Zhao, Qiao Liu
The paper evaluates privacy risks in graph neural networks enhanced by large language models (LLMs). Using a five‑stage framework, the authors test six real‑world text‑attributed graph datasets with 42 model configurations and six privacy attack methods across link, label, and membership inference threats. Results show that LLM‑enhanced GNNs are more vulnerable than shallow baselines, with semantic enrichment amplifying exploitable signals, and that differential privacy can reduce risk but at a significant cost to utility.
By Longzhu He, Zelang Wen, Chaozhuo Li, Sen Su