arXiv:2608. 03866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This white paper presents ADMITBench, a reference framework for evaluating industrial LLM advisories at the level of the proposed action.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 12025v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical devices are becoming more software-intensive, connected, and AI-enabled.
arXiv:2606. 02755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) applications are increasingly expected to satisfy deterministic institutional requirements while relying on probabilistic generative components.
arXiv:2607. 19449v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Evaluation frameworks for tool-augmented LLM agents focus overwhelmingly on capability metrics or explicit tool crashes, leaving silent infrastructure failures and HTTP 200 responses with empty, null, or malformed payloads largely unaudited.
arXiv:2607. 22926v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-impact generative AI makes catastrophic misuse a lifecycle-control problem, not merely a prompt-filtering problem.
arXiv:2606. 26185v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-as-judge ("grader") components are now standard in evaluation harnesses, including safety evaluations where a pass/fail verdict may gate downstream deployment decisions.
arXiv:2607. 07097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety evaluations of multi-agent LLM systems often compare a direct prompt with a planner-executor pipeline and report the difference as a single "pipeline effect.