arXiv Machine Learning By Meng Li (School of Computing, University of South China, Hengyang, China, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Software Evaluation and Testing for Intellectual Equipment, Hengyang, China, CNNC Key Laboratory on High Trusted Computing, Hengyang, China), Xiaohua Yang (School of Computing, University of South China, Hengyang, China, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Software Evaluation and Testing for Intellectual Equipment, Hengyang, China, CNNC Key Laboratory on High Trusted Computing, Hengyang, China), Jie Liu (School of Computing, University of South China, Hengyang, China, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Software Evaluation and Testing for Intellectual Equipment, Hengyang, China, CNNC Key Laboratory on High Trusted Computing, Hengyang, China), Shiyu Yan (School of Computing, University of South China, Hengyang, China, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Software Evaluation and Testing for Intellectual Equipment, Hengyang, China, CNNC Key Laboratory on High Trusted Computing, Hengyang, China)

A semantic mutation metric for metamorphic relation adequacy in scientific computing programs

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2605. 17437v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Context.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
2d ago

ReLoop: Structured Modeling and Behavioral Verification for Reliable LLM-Based Optimization

arXiv:2602. 15983v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural language into optimization code, but silent failures pose a critical risk: code that executes and returns solver-feasible solutions may encode semantically incorrect formulations---a feasibility--correctness gap reaching 90 percentage points on compositional problems.

By Junbo Jacob Lian, Yujun Sun, Huiling Chen, Chaoyu Zhang, Hanzhang Qin, Chung-Piaw Teo
arXiv AI
Aug 3

ModelEquivBench: Certifying Multi-Relational Evaluation of LLM-Generated Optimization Models

arXiv:2607. 29431v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models increasingly generate optimization models from natural language, but existing evaluation often reduces a generated model and its ground truth to a single equivalent/not-equivalent verdict or an execution-success rate--labels that are neither independently checkable nor faithful to the multiple distinct senses in which two formulations can agree.

By Penglin Zhu, Jungang Xu