arXiv AI By Paul Whitten, Li-Jen Chen, Sharath Baddam

2.5-D Decomposition for LLM-Based Spatial Construction

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2605. 07066v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous systems that build structures from natural-language instructions need reliable spatial reasoning, yet large language models (LLMs) make systematic coordinate errors when generating three-dimensional block placements.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 16

Ave: Guiding Agentic GPU Optimization Using Data-Flow Invariants

arXiv:2604.18616v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM coding agents can generate correct GPU kernels, but their performance still trails expert libraries. Reaching peak throughput requires co...

By Haohui Mai, Xiaoyan Guo, Xiangyun Ding, Daifeng Li, Qiuchu Yu, Chenzhun Guo, Cong Wang, Jiacheng Zhao, Christos Kozyrakis, Binhang Yuan
arXiv AI
4d ago

An Exact Generate - Transform Decomposition of Small-LLM Team Scaling Across Orchestration Architectures

The paper investigates how scaling a team of small language‑model agents affects performance across different orchestration architectures. By testing eight architectures on five short‑answer benchmarks and an executable‑code benchmark, it finds that team scaling yields large gains on arithmetic word‑problem tasks but only modest improvements on multiple‑choice and code generation tasks, with no single architecture dominating all tasks. The authors explain these patterns using a generate‑transform decomposition that separates coverage and transformation effects, showing that arithmetic tasks benefit from both coverage and critic‑guided transformation, while other tasks are limited by saturation or poor conversion.

By Blaz Bertalanic, Carolina Fortuna
arXiv AI
Sep 25

Operator Packages, Proposer Strength, and Construction-Family Plateaus in Office-Scale Verified Search

The paper reports on a large‑scale verified search experiment using a 30B language model on a laptop, evaluating three operator packages—schematic notebooks, named obstacles, and behavioural repulsion—in a factorial design across nine construction problems. Results show that the full composition of operators closes the seed‑to‑record gap more effectively than any single component, increases construction‑hash diversity, and that memory plus repulsion consistently avoids collapse. A frontier proposer achieves similar gains in far fewer samples, but the search ultimately stalls near a plateau where the reference family is adopted and optimized only when provided as code.

By Roberto I. Ono Filho