arXiv:2605. 26452v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) for robotic systems requires policies that improve task performance while satisfying state and input constraints during both training and deployment.
arXiv:2602. 04132v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) has achieved remarkable success in solving complex sequential decision-making problems.
arXiv:2606. 04749v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe robot control requires maximizing return while satisfying safety constraints.
arXiv:2608. 04732v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe actor-critic control often treats barrier filtering, uncertainty estimation, and experience replay as separate modules, even though each changes the data used for learning and control.
The paper proves that using a permissive safety filter in reinforcement learning does not compromise asymptotic performance. By formalizing safety through a safety‑critical Markov decision process and a filtered MDP, the authors show that optimal policies in the filtered MDP achieve the same return as the best safe policy in the original setting. Experiments on Safety Gymnasium confirm zero violations during training and performance that matches or exceeds unfiltered baselines.
The paper introduces LEAP-CBF, a safety filter that uses Least‑Effort Adversarial Potentials to quantify how much disturbance effort is needed to cause failure in nonlinear dynamical systems. LEAP serves as a control barrier function for the undisturbed system and can be combined with a robust safety filter that tolerates disturbances with bounded cumulative effort. The authors develop a deep reinforcement learning method to construct LEAPs and validate their effectiveness through simulations of multi‑agent systems and hardware experiments on a quadruped and quadrotors.
arXiv:2606. 14415v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) aims to maximize expected return while satisfying safety constraints, typically modeled as Constrained Markov Decision Processes (CMDPs).
arXiv:2606. 14536v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) aims to learn policies that optimize rewards while satisfying constraints.
arXiv:2501. 15373v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Merely pursuing performance may adversely affect safety, while a conservative policy for safe exploration will degrade the performance.
arXiv:2607. 07252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) enables the synthesis of control policies directly from data, making it highly appealing for complex cyber-physical systems (CPSs) and robotics.
arXiv:2608. 10204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning maximizes reward subject to safety constraints.
arXiv:2506. 02255v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Most existing safe reinforcement learning (RL) benchmarks focus on robotics and control tasks, offering limited relevance to high-stakes domains that involve structured constraints, mixed-integer decisions, and industrial complexity.
arXiv:2609.13231v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong generalization in robotic manipulation and navigation, but existing fine-tuning methods provid...