arXiv:2605. 16411v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucination remains a fundamental challenge in vision-language models (VLMs), where autoregressive generation may produce linguistically plausible yet physically inconsistent or visually ungrounded responses due to likelihood maximization under joint probabilistic modeling.
By Qinwu Xu
arXiv:2607. 13712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the rapid progress of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), they still suffer from untruthfulness issues, such as visual hallucinations, content fabrication, and unfaithful reasoning, which substantially undermine their faithfulness and practical utility.
By Zhixiao Zheng, Zheren Fu, Zhiyuan Yao, Chunxiao Liu, Dongming Zhang, Zhendong Mao
SAVOR is a training framework for multimodal large language models that adds token and answer confidence to the output schema, optimises a Group Relative Policy Optimisation objective to penalise calibration error and poor abstention, and uses the learned confidence at inference to revisit visual evidence only when uncertain. Experiments on POPE, HallusionBench, AMBER, and MMHal-Bench with InternVL3-8B and Qwen3-VL-8B backbones show that SAVOR reduces hallucination while maintaining general capability on MME and MMBench, achieving lower Expected Calibration Error than DPO and decoding baselines.
By Zixiu Ding, Zilin Zhao, Yingjie He, Xinlang Kang, Guansu Wang, Wei Zhang
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made strong progress on visual question answering and image captioning, yet they still produce fluent claims about objects, attributes, or relations that...
arXiv:2606. 26387v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) extend large language models (LLMs) with visual perception, enabling joint reasoning over images and text.
By Xi Xiao, Chen Liu, Chih-Ting Liao, Yunbei Zhang, Qizhen Lan, Yuxiang Wei, Lin Zhao, Janet Wang, Jianyang Gu, Muchao Ye, Tianyang Wang, Hao Xu
arXiv:2607. 07507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucinations in vision language models (VLMs) are commonly treated as semantic errors, yet they often arise from partial or ambiguous visual evidence.
By Feng He, Zhenting Wang, Qifan Wang, Qiang Guan, Dongfang Liu, Ruixiang Tang, Qiankun Li
arXiv:2606. 28401v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong performance in visual understanding, yet they still suffer from hallucinations, generating content that is not grounded in the image.
By Yunhun Nam, Jongheon Jeong
arXiv:2606. 15782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-language understanding and natural-language response generation.
By Pratheswaran Hariharan, Haiping Xu, Donghui Yan
arXiv:2606. 03376v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Hallucination has recently garnered significant research attention in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs).
By Ruipeng Zhang, Zhihao Li, Haozhang Yuan, C. L. Philip Chen, Tong Zhang
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in vision-language understanding and natural-language response generation. However, these systems can still produce overconfident predictions and hallucination-like outputs, particularly when the visual evidence is weak, ambiguous, or semantically inconsistent.
arXiv:2606. 03376v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination has recently garnered significant research attention in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs).
By Ruipeng Zhang, Zhihao Li, Haozhang Yuan, C. L. Philip Chen, Tong Zhang
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in multi-image scenarios requiring complex reasoning across visual contexts. However, current MLLMs remain fundamentally limited by o...